Part 346: Another One Bites The Dust

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

Another One Bites The Dust

If you’ve been following Mortgage Advisor on FIRE for any length of time, you’ll know there are a few recurring themes:

Financial independence.

Autism.

Cats.

LEGO.

Coffee.

Questionable life decisions.

Highlighting yet another Tory clusterfuck.

And changing jobs.

Well, dear reader, it is with a mixture of amusement, resignation, and the sound of a certain Queen bassline playing in the background that I can announce that I have once again left a job.

“Another one bites the dust.”

Before anyone starts sharpening their pitchforks or speculating wildly in the comments, let me be clear: there is no scandal, no dramatic falling out, and no tale of corporate espionage.

Sometimes things simply don’t work out, and that’s ok. In truth, I started feeling a little bit of regret at taking the role a while ago, but tried to push that down and make a success of it. However, the realisation that I was living as an example of the Sunk Cost Fallacy brought me to my senses. Once that mental switch was flipped, I gave notice minutes later. 

I’ve spent the last few years on what can best be described as a tour of the UK mortgage industry. After more than thirteen years at Lloyds, I have sampled various flavours of mortgage advice, each one teaching me something new about the industry, about business, and about myself.

What I have learned is that there is a huge difference between being able to do a job and finding an environment where you can thrive doing it. If I do something, I want to be successful at it. In the mortgage industry, a major factor in success is finding the right environment and support structure. For many years at Lloyds I had that, with some amazing managers and colleagues. My time at Lloyds came to an end because it just all went a bit stale after more than 13 years doing the same thing in the same way. 

The older I get, the more I realise that success isn’t just about income. It’s about culture. It’s about values. It’s about whether you wake up on a Monday morning thinking, “Let’s do this,” rather than, “How many years until retirement?” I really, truly, started my time at my most recent role with the former but I found myself thinking more about the latter as time went on.

Thankfully, financial independence gives me options. Not enough options to retire tomorrow and spend my days cycling around Yorkshire listening to the latest Jeremy Robinson book, but enough options to make decisions based on what is right rather than what is merely necessary.

There’s a reason it’s called FU Money, and that is a position I never take for granted.

So, what happens next?

At the time of writing, I’m exploring my options. The mortgage industry remains a career that I enjoy, and there are still plenty of avenues left to investigate. The story is far from over.

I’ve already had a number of recruiters reach out to me, and I’ve heard that a few people have been fighting my corner in the background. I’m not massively concerned as things stand, but for now I find myself standing at another crossroads.

What’s the phrase, “man plans, god laughs”?

After all…

“Another one bites the dust.”

The Freedom Dividend

Now that I’ve left another role without having anything else lined up, I’ve encountered the same sort of question from several people;

“Aren’t you worried?”

The answer is “not particularly”.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have unlimited money and although I’m not far from being able to retire, I can’t just retire now. I’m not at the point where I have zero financial concerns, but what I do have is time and breathing space. I have choices. I have freedom.

This freedom was not created by a single stroke of genius or lucky win. It is the end result of years of financial discipline and solid investing habits. Every ISA contribution, every instance of delayed gratification where I could have spent on something but didn’t, it’s all built the foundations for being able to sit where I am now. 

For many people employment feels like a trap. It’s something that you simply have to do because there is no other option. This is the beauty of FI: you can reverse that scenario. 

I mentioned FU Money before, and it’s not to sound arrogant or flippant. It’s not just about being able to tell someone where to go if you’re in an uncomfortable situation. It’s about knowing that when a situation becomes intolerable, you can simply leave. It’s negotiating from a position of strength.

There are a couple of things I’ve told many people over the years who have been struggling with a work situation. The first is that any employer/employee relationship is never going to be fair. It’s not about fairness. By its very nature, it’s an unfair relationship, so you need to stop thinking about it in those terms. 

The second thing leads on from that point about fairness. In order to rebalance the scales when it comes to negotiating with an employer, you need leverage. I’m going to say it again just for emphasis; stop thinking about what is fair. That will not get you anywhere. The key word is not fairness but leverage.

Leverage can take many forms.

If you’re an exceptional performer who would be difficult to replace, that’s leverage.

If you possess specialist skills that are in high demand, that’s leverage.

If you have an extensive professional network that can open doors elsewhere, that’s leverage.

However, one of the most powerful forms of leverage is financial. The less dependent you are on your next payslip, the more options become available to you.

This is one of the reasons I find it strange when people dismiss saving and investing as simply being about retirement. Retirement is merely one possible destination. The real benefit is the flexibility that financial security provides throughout your working life.

Imagine two employees sitting in the same meeting. Both dislike what is happening around them. Both disagree with the direction of travel. Both are unhappy with how they are being treated.

One has no savings, significant debt, and relies entirely upon their next monthly salary. The other has built up a substantial emergency fund, investments, and enough financial resilience to withstand a period out of work if necessary.

Although they appear to be in the same position, they are not.

The first employee has very little room to manoeuvre. Every decision is constrained by financial necessity. They may know they should leave, but they cannot afford to. They may want to challenge something, but they fear the consequences.

The second employee still has responsibilities, bills to pay, and risks to consider, but they possess something incredibly valuable.

Choice.

That choice changes the dynamic of every conversation.

It changes how you negotiate salary and working conditions.

It changes how willing you are to challenge poor decisions and how much nonsense you are prepared to tolerate.

Most importantly, it changes how afraid you are. Fear is often the hidden force behind many workplace decisions. Fear of losing income. Fear of uncertainty. Fear of not finding something else. Fear of the mortgage payment. Fear of what happens next.

Financial independence doesn’t eliminate fear entirely, but it reduces its influence.

When you know that you could survive for months, or even years, without employment if necessary, you stop approaching every workplace disagreement from a position of vulnerability. You begin negotiating from a position of strength.

Ironically, this often makes people better employees, not worse ones. They become more willing to speak honestly. More willing to challenge assumptions. More willing to walk away from situations that are unhealthy or unsustainable.

That’s why I believe one of the greatest benefits of building wealth is not the ability to buy more things. It’s the ability to say no.

No to bad opportunities, poor treatment, environments that are damaging your wellbeing.

No to situations that are taking you further away from the life you actually want.

The person who can say no possesses leverage, and leverage, far more than fairness, is what shifts the balance of power.

Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

Few football clubs have experienced a season quite as turbulent as Sheffield Wednesday.

The months during the 2025/26 season have been dominated by uncertainty, frustration and, at times, genuine concern about the future of the club. Administration, financial difficulties, the departure of much of the playing squad, protests against our previous owner, and an atmosphere of instability around Hillsborough that wasn’t just emotional with very real concerns that the stadium was unsafe for supporters. For many fans, it felt as though the club had reached a crossroads. 

Now that the season has finished, with a record low points total and relegation to the third tier of English football, you would be forgiven for assuming that the club was on its knees and ready to be put out to pasture. Instead, the club is under new ownership and the message is one of rebirth. All clubs think that their fans are the best, but even with the blue tinted glasses off it’s hard to argue that Wednesdayites are not up there with the best in the world. They turn out in numbers regardless, and have only boycotted games as part of a campaign to remove the previous owner. 

Sheffield Wednesday have endured a campaign that will live long in the memory for all the wrong reasons. Results on the pitch were dismal, confidence was shattered, and optimism was in short supply. Against that backdrop, the new leadership team set themselves an ambitious challenge. Their target was to sell 21,000 season tickets, a figure that would represent one of the highest totals in the club’s history and a powerful demonstration that the bond between club and supporter remained intact despite everything that had happened.

Many outside Sheffield may have viewed that target with scepticism. After all, football supporters are often portrayed as consumers. When the product deteriorates, the theory goes, customers simply take their money elsewhere. It is a neat and tidy explanation, one that works perfectly well in most industries.

Football, however, has never operated according to normal rules.

A football club is not merely a form of entertainment. It is part of a city’s identity, a repository of memories, traditions and shared experiences that span generations. Supporters do not simply choose to support a club in the same way they might choose a streaming service or a favourite restaurant. For many, their football club becomes intertwined with family history, friendships and some of life’s most significant moments.

That is why the achievement of reaching 21,000 season ticket sales deserves recognition beyond the headline figure itself. Yes, Wednesday have smashed that target.

This was not a fanbase responding to success. There had been no promotion to celebrate, no cup run to inspire renewed optimism, and no promise of instant transformation. Instead, supporters were being asked to commit their money and their faith after a period in which both had been stretched to breaking point, and they responded.

In doing so, Sheffield Wednesday supporters have demonstrated something that those outside football often struggle to understand. Loyalty is not measured when times are good. It is measured when there are perfectly rational reasons to walk away and people choose not to.

The easiest decision this summer would have been to wait. To hold back. To demand proof that the club was moving in the right direction before committing hard-earned money. Nobody could have blamed supporters for taking that approach. Indeed, many clubs in similar circumstances have seen significant declines in attendance and season ticket sales as disillusionment takes hold.

Instead, Hillsborough will once again be populated by thousands upon thousands of supporters who have chosen to believe that better days lie ahead.

That belief should not be mistaken for blind optimism. Wednesday supporters have seen too much over recent years to be naïve. They understand the challenges that remain. The club still faces a lengthy rebuilding process, both on and off the pitch. Trust must be restored, stability must be established, and the foundations for long-term success must be laid carefully and deliberately.

What the season ticket figures demonstrate is not that supporters believe the work is complete. Rather, they show that supporters are willing to play their part in ensuring that the work can begin. There is something profoundly encouraging about that.

In an era where football is increasingly dominated by discussions of broadcasting revenues, sponsorship deals and commercial growth, it is easy to forget that clubs ultimately derive their strength from the communities that support them. Owners come and go. Managers arrive and depart. Players move on. What remains are the supporters who continue to turn up year after year, carrying the history and identity of the club with them.

Advertisements

Our previous owner balked at the claim he was simply a custodian of the club. Our new owners have embraced that assertion. The sale of 21,000 season tickets is therefore about far more than revenue. It is a statement about resilience. It is evidence that Sheffield Wednesday remains deeply woven into the fabric of the city and the lives of those who follow the club.

Most importantly, it sends a message at the conclusion of one of the most chaotic periods in the club’s history. Despite everything that has happened, the supporters remain.

For all the uncertainty that still exists, that may prove to be the most important foundation upon which Sheffield Wednesday’s recovery is built.

I’ll be there next season with my Dad as we, hopefully, watch this great and historic club regain former glories.

What I’m Doing

Listening: Parallax by Jeremy Robinson.

Watching: Rescue Me (Netflix).

Reading: Leviathan Wakes (Expanse Book 1) by James S. A. Corey

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £145,367.03.

Fuck It Fund: £321.16.

Pensions: £122,942.63.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £510,993.82.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £173,797.96. 

Total Debts: £173,797.96.

Total Wealth: £337,195.86.

Top Ten Countdown – The Best Financial Advice

Last week I covered number 10 in my countdown. This week, we move on to number 9.

10. Know Where Your Money Actually Goes

9. Avoid Lifestyle Inflation

One of the most dangerous financial traps isn’t a market crash, a recession, or even a bad investment. It’s success, or rather what happens after success.

If you ask a group of people what the answer to their financial problems is, most will reply “earning more money.” To an extent, this is correct. Earning more money can reduce financial stress and free up more disposable income. The problem, or the danger, is when people increase their spending in line with their extra income.

I’m thinking of people who get a significant pay raise and decide to get a more expensive car, or upgrade their Sky package. Their income increases, and their spending follows suit.

The term for this is “lifestyle inflation”, and it’s a major reason why high earners complain of living month to month, with little in the way of savings or investments. Their pay goes up, and suddenly they need a bigger house with a bigger mortgage.

All of this comes with associated increases in spending. You have a bigger house, and suddenly you need more furniture and a bigger television. You have the extra costs for insurance, utilities, and keeping up with your neighbours as they plant elaborate gardens. 

None of these purchases are necessarily bad in isolation. The problem is that they become permanent. Every upgrade becomes the new normal, and the prospect of stepping back to a previous standard of living seems scary. What was once considered a luxury quickly turns into a necessity. The nicer car that felt extravagant six months ago now feels ordinary. The larger house becomes simply “home”. The upgraded lifestyle stops feeling special and starts feeling expected.

Advertisements

This creates a strange situation where someone earning twice as much as they did ten years ago may not actually feel any wealthier. Their income has increased, but so have their obligations. Their financial freedom hasn’t improved because every extra pound has already been assigned a job.

Lifestyle inflation is particularly dangerous because it often arrives disguised as progress.

Society actively encourages it. We are constantly told that success should be visible. If your income rises, surely your car should improve. Surely your house should get bigger. Surely people should be able to see that you’ve done well.

But genuine wealth and the appearance of wealth are not the same thing, and the difference is often invisible from the outside.

One of the most eye-opening lessons in personal finance is realising that many wealthy people don’t look wealthy at all. They aren’t trying to impress anyone. They’re busy accumulating assets rather than status symbols.

Meanwhile, some people who appear affluent are financing that appearance with debt, leases, monthly payments, and a constant need to maintain a lifestyle that consumes every penny they earn.

This is why avoiding lifestyle inflation can have such a profound impact on your long-term finances. Every pay rise presents a choice. You can spend all of it, some of it, or almost none of it.

Imagine receiving a £3,000 annual pay rise after tax. If you immediately absorb that into your lifestyle, nothing really changes. You’ll likely enjoy some nicer things, but your overall financial position remains much the same.

If instead you invest most of it, that same pay rise can become the foundation of future financial freedom.

Repeat that process several times throughout your career and the results become remarkable. The person who consistently saves a portion of every pay rise often ends up in a dramatically stronger position than someone who earned the same income but spent every increase.

I’m not arguing that people should not enjoy their earnings. Like with most of the advice I go through in this blog, the reality is nuanced and personal. If you get a significant increase in income, by all means treat yourself but do so in a mindful way. You could even have a 50/50 system, for example. For each increase in pay you commit to investing half the increase whilst using the other half on something enjoyable. It doesn’t even have to be 50/50. It could be 60/40, or 30/70. 

There is a strain of personal finance advice that treats every purchase as a moral failing and every pound spent as a missed investment opportunity. That’s not a life; it’s becoming a slave to your finances when you are supposed to be working for financial freedom.

Advertisements

Again, for emphasis, the goal isn’t to avoid improving your lifestyle. The goal is to improve it consciously. Spend more on the things that genuinely matter to you. Upgrade the areas of your life that bring lasting happiness or meaningful convenience. Just be careful not to let every increase in income automatically become an increase in spending.

Financial independence is often portrayed as something achieved through extraordinary sacrifice. In reality, for many people it is simply the result of allowing income to rise faster than lifestyle.

The next time you receive a pay rise, ask yourself a simple question.

Do I want this money to improve my lifestyle today, or my freedom tomorrow?

There is no right or wrong answer. But making the choice deliberately is far more powerful than letting lifestyle inflation make it for you.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Part 345: A Good Week and the Best Financial Advice

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

Weekly Update

The weather has been awful for most of the week meaning I’ve not been able to get out as much as I’d have liked. However, we did manage a nice walk with a friend towards the end of the week. Our friend, Yvonne, who I’ve mentioned before, picked us up and drove us to Rivelin, where we completed an almost 10k walk. Along the way we saw lots of mallards, mandarins, and many herons. There is something so refreshing about being in nature, with the trees, water, and wildlife. 

We also met lots of excited dogs, and it’s impossible not to smile when they come bounding over with a big smile of their own wanting attention.  We saw one dog carrying an impressively sized branch, and then a while later another dog carrying half a tree. I made sure to praise both dogs for their incredible stick carrying efforts.

On Saturday we were due to go for a group bike ride in the morning but the weather was, again, awful, so we gave that a miss. Just after lunch the weather was a bit better, so I went for a ride. Oana wasn’t feeling great and we needed some shopping, so I rode out to a couple of supermarkets to get what we needed. 

Along the route to meadowhall shopping centre the dedicated cycle lane had been closed for some sort of street market. Quite why they chose to hold it here instead of in one of the many vast car parks in the centre I don’t know. A few people have been bitching about it online, and whilst I don’t have an issue with street markets, it seems odd to hold it on a cycle path when there are huge empty spaces just a few meters away.

This particular cycle lane is a nightmare at the best of times as people who must be NPCs (non-player characters) just shuffle along like zombies across the cycle lane and then start growling when you point out their stupidity. Would these people just walk out into the road without looking? Actually, yes, they probably would.

A Great Experience at Urban Choola

On Sunday myself, Oana, and my parents went for lunch at Urban Choola, an Indian restaurant in Sheffield.  It was our first time here, and like with any first visit to a restaurant there’s always the concern that it’s going to be a bad experience. Fortunately, this meal was a delight. We all enjoyed our food and we ate until we were full. The service was friendly and not too intrusive. All in all, a cracking restaurant experience and we would definitely go back.

Dear Motorists

Every few weeks I see the same story. Someone gets caught speeding, ignoring a red light, or caught driving through a bus lane, or maybe found parking where they shouldn’t. 

A few days later, an official looking envelope arrives, and suddenly the victimhood begins.

“It’s just a money-making scheme!”

“It’s a cash grab by the clown-cil!”

“They should be tackling real crime!”

“It’s outrageous!”

No. What’s outrageous is that a fully grown adult somehow managed to convince themselves that the consequences of their actions are everyone else’s fault.

Let’s clear something up. Traffic cameras do not randomly fine people. They don’t emerge from the shadows and decide to ruin someone’s day. They don’t wake up in the morning and think, “You know what? Let’s target Bob in his Vauxhall Corsa.” There’s no malice or bullying going on here.

The camera sits there doing absolutely nothing. Day after day. Week after week. Month after month until, inevitably, someone decides to ignore the clearly signposted speed limit, drive down a bus lane, jump a red light, or park where they shouldn’t.

The camera simply records the evidence. That’s it. The easiest way to avoid a speeding fine is almost laughably simple:

Don’t speed.

That’s the entire strategy.

Not “drive 38 in a 30 and hope.” Not “I know the road.” Not “everyone else does it.”

Just don’t speed. Problem solved.

The same applies to bus lanes.

If the giant painted BUS LANE markings, the road signs, and the giant red tarmac somehow fail to communicate the message, I’m not sure what else society is supposed to do.

Perhaps we need a giant flashing sign saying:

“THIS LANE IS NOT FOR YOU, STEVE.”

Then comes my favourite argument: “They should be dealing with real crime.”

Ah yes, the mythical “real crime” defence. The one that appears every single time someone gets caught doing something they knew they weren’t supposed to be doing.

Advertisements

Here’s a thought; If people stopped taking the piss with the law, the authorities wouldn’t have to spend time enforcing it.

The police didn’t invent speeding. The police didn’t invent dangerous driving. The police didn’t invent people treating traffic laws like optional suggestions. Drivers did that.

Let’s be honest, many of the same people screaming about traffic enforcement are the first people to complain about reckless drivers outside schools, speeding through residential areas, dangerous overtakes, illegal parking, and drivers using their phones.

I also don’t want to generalise too much, but fuck it, I’m here now. I can state with a high degree of confidence that the sort of people I’ve described will have also uttered something about “stopping the boats” at some point this year.

Apparently enforcement is only acceptable when it applies to someone else. The reality is that modern traffic cameras are one of the most efficient forms of law enforcement we have.

A camera can monitor a road twenty-four hours a day. It doesn’t need breaks, overtime, pension and NI contributions, or sick pay. It simply records violations and allows police resources to be used elsewhere.

Which is exactly what the “focus on real crime” crowd claim they want. You can’t simultaneously argue that police should spend less time on traffic offences while also opposing the technology that allows them to spend less time on traffic offences.

Pick a lane, just preferably not the bus or cycle lanes.

And before anyone says it, yes, speed limits can sometimes feel arbitrary. Yes, some roads probably should have different limits. Yes, local authorities occasionally make baffling decisions.

That’s a perfectly reasonable debate to have. But once the limit is there, the rule is the rule.

You don’t get to ignore it and then act surprised-Pikachu when you’re caught.

That’s like walking into Tesco, stuffing a steak down your trousers, getting stopped by security, and then complaining that they should be catching “real criminals.” The level of self-awareness is remarkable, as are the mental gymnastics required for this to somehow make sense in your brain.

The thing that fascinates me most is how many people seem to view themselves as law-abiding citizens while simultaneously treating every traffic regulation as optional. Yes, you might get away with speeding a few times, but when it goes wrong and you kill a car full of people, it’s not the sort of thing you can take back.

If you only obey rules when they’re convenient, you’re not really obeying them. You’re negotiating with them. Cameras don’t negotiate. They simply remember.

So next time someone starts ranting about speed cameras, bus lane cameras, red-light cameras, average speed checks, or whatever enforcement technology has ruined their week, ask a simple question:

“What exactly were you doing when the camera caught you?” Because nine times out of ten, the answer is the same: breaking the rules.

If that’s the case, I have some revolutionary money-saving tips.

  • Slow down.
  • Stay out of the bus lane.
  • Obey the signs.
  • Keep your phone in your pocket.

Congratulations! You’ve just beaten the system.

Advertisements

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: Parallax by Jeremy Robinson.

Watching: Rescue Me (Netflix).

Reading: Leviathan Wakes (Expanse Book 1) by James S. A. Corey

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £147,225.24.

Fuck It Fund: £321.16.

Pensions: £125,871.50.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £515,780.90.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £173,797.96. 

Total Debts: £173,797.96.

Total Wealth: £341,982.94.

Over the last few weeks I put together my countdown of the greatest science fiction television series of all time. It was one of the most popular series of posts I’ve written in quite some time, generating plenty of discussion, debate, agreement, disagreement, and the occasional accusation that I was criminally underrating somebody’s favourite show.

The response got me thinking. One of the things I enjoy most about writing this blog is taking a subject I care about and breaking it down into a ranked list. Lists are fun. They’re easy to follow, they encourage discussion, and they force you to think carefully about what truly deserves to be at the top.

So, I’ve decided to make countdowns a regular feature going forward. Don’t worry, Mortgage Advisor on FIRE isn’t suddenly turning into BuzzFeed or Bored Panda. The focus will remain on personal finance, investing, financial independence, psychology, and the various random topics that catch my attention. But from time to time, I’ll be putting together a ranked list on a particular subject and explaining not just what made the list, but why.

For this latest countdown, I’m tackling something much closer to the heart of the blog: the best financial advice of all time.

This isn’t a list of clever investment strategies, stock tips, or complex tax planning techniques. In fact, most of the advice on this list is remarkably simple. That’s because the best financial advice usually isn’t complicated. The challenge isn’t understanding it; it’s consistently applying it.

Some of these lessons are centuries old. Others have been repeated by investors, financial planners, and ordinary people who have quietly built wealth over decades. Yet despite their simplicity, they remain as relevant today as ever.

So let’s begin with number ten.

10. Know Where Your Money Actually Goes

If there is one piece of financial advice that almost everyone needs to hear, it is this: before you try to change your spending, understand your spending.

It sounds obvious, but many people have only a vague idea where their money goes each month. They know roughly what they earn, roughly what the mortgage or rent costs, and roughly how much they have left in their account before payday. Beyond that, things become surprisingly fuzzy. Ask someone how much they spend on takeaways, subscriptions, coffees, Amazon purchases, or impulse spending, and the answer is often little more than an educated guess.

The problem with guesses is that they are frequently wrong, and I have seen this time and time again with people who come to me about their mortgage. I’ll ask how much is being spent on takeaways, for example, and when I try to verify this on their bank statements, the two figures are often wildly different. I don’t blame or judge people for this. As a species we are generally poor at estimating this sort of behaviour.

When people decide they need to budget, their first instinct is often to start tracking every penny they spend. They download an app, create a spreadsheet, colour-code categories, and enthusiastically record every purchase. For a week or two, they become the model of financial discipline. Then life gets busy, the tracking becomes tedious, and the whole system falls apart.

Even when people stick with it, there is another problem. The moment you know you are being monitored, you change your behaviour. It’s the financial equivalent of stepping onto a set of scales every hour. You stop buying things you would normally buy. You become unusually careful. You don’t capture your real spending habits; you capture a temporary version of yourself that is on its best behaviour.

A far better starting point is often to look backwards when you were not being monitored. You wouldn’t set a weight loss goal without knowing what your currently weigh.

Go through the last three to six months of bank statements and credit card statements. Don’t judge yourself. Don’t try to justify anything. Simply observe. Where did the money actually go?

This exercise can be uncomfortable because it replaces assumptions with evidence.

You might discover that the occasional takeaway you thought cost £50 a month is actually closer to £200. The streaming subscriptions you barely notice add up to another £50. The quick trips to the supermarket somehow total several hundred pounds. Those little purchases that seemed insignificant in isolation suddenly reveal themselves as a meaningful percentage of your income.

Equally, you might find pleasant surprises. Perhaps you’re already spending less than you thought. Perhaps your finances are healthier than you realised. The goal isn’t to find reasons to feel guilty. The goal is to understand reality.

This is where many budgeting articles get things backwards. They start with the question, “How much should you spend?” when the more important question is, “How much do you currently spend?”

You cannot create a realistic financial plan until you know your starting point. A budget built on wishful thinking is doomed to fail. A budget built on actual behaviour has a chance of succeeding.

The beauty of this approach is that it also highlights your priorities. Every pound spent is effectively a vote for something. Looking through your statements reveals what you’ve been voting for with your money. Sometimes those votes align perfectly with your values. Other times they don’t.

Maybe you say travel is important but spend more on takeaway food than holidays. Maybe you claim financial independence is your goal but discover hundreds of pounds disappearing on purchases you barely remember making. These aren’t moral failings. They’re simply useful pieces of information.

Once you understand where your money is going, every other piece of financial advice becomes easier to apply. You can identify areas to cut back without feeling deprived. You can increase savings without guessing. You can make informed decisions instead of emotional ones.

Most importantly, you stop operating on assumptions.

Financial success doesn’t begin with investing, side hustles, or finding the perfect savings account. It begins with awareness. Before you worry about where your money should go, take the time to discover where it’s already going.

The answers may surprise you. They may even change your life.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Part 344: Another Media Appearance

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

Weekly Update

The weather has been pretty great recently and I’ve taken full advantage. Up to and including May 29th, I’ve completed over twenty rides and covered over 400km. Being outside, especially along the canal and river with all the greenery and wildlife is so refreshing for mind and body.

It was just the other day that Oana and I were talking about how we never seem to have bad bike rides. We should have known better than to tempt fate…

On Saturday afternoon we went for a ride along one of our usual routes and part way between the city centre and Meadowhall, along the canal, Oana’s front tire went flat. It wasn’t a sudden blowout, she said she’d felt it start going weird a few minutes before. 

We looked online for anywhere close we could get a repair done, as we didn’t really have the right equipment (our own fault entirely) but the closest places were still a good walk away. We aimed for Meadowhall as they have bike pumps and whatnot, and along the way we passed a Smyth’s toy shop which sold bike pumps. The only one they sold was a cheap, plastic, piece of shit that did nothing. So back to square one. 

We did some Google-fu to see if there were any mobile bike repair companies working, but the one we found did not inspire any confidence when we spoke to them on the phone.

Our next attempt was to see if we could get on the tram back to the city centre. In Sheffield we have the Supertram network which is generally decent. Technically bikes aren’t allowed unless they can be folded up, but it was a quiet time and we thought we’d appeal to their mercy and see what could be done. They would only need to take Oana as I could ride home. Anyway, the tram was empty but the conductor would not even let us speak as he just kept banging on about bikes not being allowed. Fair enough, I suppose but he did not have to be so rude about it.

We decided that the best course was to just walk home. Buses don’t let bikes on, and we were nowhere near a train station. After about half an hour of walking we met two other cyclists who stopped and helped us repair the tire. It wasn’t a perfect repair, but it was inflated and sealed enough to get us home. Some people, like these cyclists, are great. Others, are not.

Another Media Appearance

The big news this week is that my recent interview with Sky News has been published on their site. They say any publicity is good publicity, but as a fellow poster on a forum I post on said:

I’ve never hidden my past struggles with gambling, and it’s now 2,501 days since I last placed a bet. It does feel a bit reductive to open with the words “Former gambling addict…” though.

Anyway, the article has generated some discussion online and I want to address some of the common thoughts people have had…

My Thoughts on the Sky News FIRE Article

First of all, I want to say thank you to Sky News for including me. The article was generally fair, balanced, and did something that many mainstream pieces about FIRE fail to do: it acknowledged both the benefits and the criticisms of the movement.

That said, there were a few points that I’d like to expand upon, because when you’re interviewed for an article, there simply isn’t room to include every nuance.

Advertisements

£20,000 Is Not Our Target

One figure that stood out in the article was the suggestion that Oana and I could live on around £20,000 per year. While that number is technically accurate, it’s important to understand what it represents. £20,000 is not our target lifestyle. It’s our minimum viable lifestyle.

It’s the amount we’d need to keep a roof over our heads, food in the cupboards, the bills paid, and the lights on. In other words, it’s the number we’d need to survive.

We don’t want to merely survive. We want to enjoy life.

Our actual spending target in retirement is higher than that because we want room for holidays, hobbies, experiences, helping family, continuing to adopt and look after elderly rescue cats, and all the other things that make life enjoyable, such as absurd amounts of LEGO.

The £20,000 figure is simply useful for planning because it tells us where the floor is. It’s a bit like when a football club says they just want to reach forty points; they want more, but the first goal is always survival.

We Aren’t Sacrificing Things We Want

Another common reaction whenever FIRE is discussed is that people assume those pursuing it are living lives of constant sacrifice. I understand why, but it’s not true.

The article mentioned that we don’t have children, don’t own a car, don’t smoke, and don’t drink alcohol. For some people, that sounds like a list of sacrifices. For us, it isn’t. This belief is putting the cart before the horse.

We don’t drink alcohol because we don’t particularly enjoy it. We don’t smoke because neither of us has any desire to. We don’t own a car because our lifestyle doesn’t require one. I’ve lived in Kelham Island since 2012, and between walking, cycling, trains, buses, and the occasional taxi, I’ve never felt the need to own a vehicle, and the same goes for Oana.

Most importantly, we don’t have children because we don’t want children. It’s an important part of my beliefs that creating life is a huge responsibility and unless you are totally and completely ready to be a parent, you shouldn’t do it. I always say that you should live the life you want. Too many people, at least in my experience, have kids and get married because it’s expected.

The point here is that this isn’t a financial decision, but rather a life decision that just happens to have financial consequences. I think this distinction matters because some readers may come away thinking we’ve given up these things in pursuit of financial independence. The reality is much simpler:

We’ve built our financial plan around the life we want to live, rather than the other way around.

FIRE Isn’t About Spending Less

One of the biggest misconceptions about FIRE is that it’s all about extreme frugality. In my experience, that’s not really true.

The question isn’t: “How can I spend less money?”

The question is: “Am I spending money on the things that genuinely matter to me?”

Let’s take cars as an example again. I don’t give a single solitary shit about cars.

If somebody offered me a £10,000 car and a £50,000 car that both got me from A to B equally well, I’d happily take the cheaper option and invest the difference, but that’s me.

Someone else might absolutely love cars. They might get genuine enjoyment from them.

If that’s the case, and they can comfortably afford it, then there’s nothing wrong with buying the more expensive one.

The key word is mindful though. I think everyone should occasionally stop and ask themselves:

“Am I buying this because I genuinely value it, or because I feel like I’m supposed to have it?”

Advertisements

Financial Independence Is About Options

Perhaps the biggest misconception of all is in the name itself. People focus on the “retire early” part, but for myself and others I’ve met following their own FI plan, the more important part has always been “financial independence.”

The goal was never to stop working at the first possible opportunity, the goal was to create options.

Options to change career, reduce hours, walk away from toxic workplaces, spend more time with family, or do things just for the pleasure of it rather than for a wage.

Money can’t solve every problem, but it can buy flexibility, and flexibility is often what people are really searching for.

If there’s one thing I’d want people to take away from both the Sky News article and this blog, it’s that FIRE isn’t a one-size-fits-all blueprint.

You don’t have to give up everything you enjoy or live on beans and rice.

What you do need is clarity about what matters to you and what doesn’t.

You then need the confidence to build your life around your own priorities rather than what someone else expects of you.

For Oana and me, that means a life without children, without a car, and without alcohol.

For somebody else, it might mean raising a family, owning a sports car, and travelling the world.

Both are perfectly valid. For most people, they will find achieving FI easier with the first scenario rather than the second. It’s not to say one life choice is wrong and the other right. The inescapable fact is that FI will be much more difficult in the second scenario.

Anyway, the important thing is that you’re making those choices consciously rather than just doing what you think you need to.

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: 2034 by Elliot Ackerman and Admiral James Stavridis.

Watching: Rescue Me (Netflix).

Reading: Leviathan Wakes (Expanse Book 1) by James S. A. Corey

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £147,533.45.

Fuck It Fund: £22.30.

Pensions: £125,089.38.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £515,008.13.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £173,797.96. 

Total Debts: £173,797.96.

Total Wealth: £341,210.17.

The Bricks & Minifigs LEGO Dispute: What I Think I Know So Far

I only became aware of the Bricks & Minifigs situation recently, and I’m still trying to piece together the exact details. So, before I go any further, this is not me claiming to have the definitive version of events. It’s more a case of me looking at what has been reported, what has been alleged, what has been denied, and trying to make sense of a story that seems to have turned from “a dispute over a LEGO collection” into a full-blown internet drama.

Advertisements

And because this involves allegations, legal disputes, franchise agreements, and a lot of people being very angry online, I’m going to be careful with my wording.

From what I understand, the case centres on a large LEGO Star Wars collection owned by Bryan Mansell and his father. Reports suggest the collection was built up over many years and included hundreds of sets and more than a thousand minifigures. Some reports have put the estimated value as high as $200,000, although Bricks & Minifigs disputes that figure and has suggested the documented value may be lower.

The basic version, as I currently understand it, is that the collection was placed with a Bricks & Minifigs franchise store in Salem-Keizer, Oregon, under some form of consignment arrangement. In simple terms, a consignment deal means one person gives goods to a shop to sell on their behalf. The shop takes a cut, and the owner receives the rest. That sort of arrangement makes sense for something like a large LEGO collection because individually selling hundreds of sets and minifigures is a lot of work.

Where it gets messy is what happened afterwards…

The local franchise reportedly changed hands, or at least came under new control, and the original consignment arrangement became disputed. The Mansell family’s side appears to be that the collection remained theirs, and that either the remaining stock should have been returned or the proceeds properly accounted for. Bricks & Minifigs corporate, on the other hand, has said that it was not a party to the consignment agreement, did not authorise it, and that consignment arrangements were not allowed under its franchise rules.

That distinction matters legally, but it does not necessarily make the story feel any cleaner from the outside.

This is one of those situations where the legal question and the moral reaction may not line up neatly. Legally, there may be a major difference between a deal made with a local franchisee and a deal made with the wider corporate brand. There may be issues around who had possession of the stock, what was sold, what was moved offsite, what records exist, what agreements were signed, and what obligations transferred when the store changed hands.

But morally, most people will look at the headline version and think: a family handed over a valuable LEGO collection, and now they apparently do not have the collection or the money they expected from it. That is the part that lands emotionally.

Why it has exploded online…

LEGO is not just plastic. Well, technically it is plastic. Very expensive plastic. But for collectors, it is also memory, nostalgia, time, obsession, and in some cases a serious financial asset. A large Star Wars LEGO collection built up over many years is not the same as a box of old toys under the stairs. It can represent decades of collecting, careful storage, emotional attachment, and potentially life-changing value.

That is probably why this story has cut through in a way that a more ordinary commercial dispute might not have done. People understand the emotional value of a collection. They understand how vulnerable someone can feel when they hand something precious over to a business. They also understand the frustration of being bounced between different parties, each one saying, in effect, “not our problem”.

At the same time, I do think it is worth being careful about internet certainty.

The online version of a dispute is often the most emotionally satisfying version, not necessarily the most accurate one. Once a story gets simplified into heroes and villains, it becomes very hard for nuance to survive. In this case, Bricks & Minifigs has denied stealing the collection and says corporate did not take, sell, or conceal it. The company also says only a small amount of potentially related inventory was found after the store was repossessed, and that much of the stock may already have been sold or moved before corporate became involved.

Whether that explanation is convincing is a separate question. But it exists, and if I’m writing about this honestly, I have to acknowledge it.

There is also the franchise angle, which is fascinating in a slightly grim way. As consumers, we tend to see a brand name and assume we are dealing with “the company”. If I walk into a branch of a familiar chain, I do not mentally separate the local operator, the franchisee, the franchisor, the landlord, the parent company, and whoever controls the till system. I see the sign above the door.

But legally, those distinctions can matter enormously.

That is one of the uncomfortable lessons here. If you hand over valuable items to a business operating under a known brand, who are you actually contracting with? The local store? The franchisee? The wider brand? What happens if the franchisee goes bust, sells up, defaults, gets removed, or loses control of the premises? What happens to your goods if they are not clearly recorded, segregated, insured, and traceable?

For anyone who collects, invests in, or resells physical items, that should be a sobering thought.

It also made me think about the wider world of alternative assets. I’ve written before about investing, financial independence, and the temptation to see anything with a rising secondary market as an “asset class”. LEGO, watches, trading cards, whisky, trainers, retro games; they all have communities where people talk about values, returns, scarcity, and future gains.

But this case is a reminder that an asset is only as safe as the chain of custody around it.

A Vanguard fund does not go missing because someone moved it to an offsite storage unit. A pension does not get mixed up with someone else’s stock room. An ISA does not depend on whether a local franchisee correctly logged each minifigure. Physical collectibles have a very different risk profile. They can be stolen, damaged, miscatalogued, disputed, sold without proper records, or trapped in legal arguments that cost more to resolve than most people can afford.

That does not mean collectibles are bad. I love LEGO. I understand why people collect it, and I understand why some sets become seriously valuable. But stories like this show why I’d be very wary of treating collectibles as a major part of a serious financial plan. They can have value, but they also come with storage risk, liquidity risk, authentication risk, platform risk, and, as this case appears to show, counterparty risk.

The YouTube element has also turned the whole thing into something much stranger. Reckless Ben became involved and helped push the story into the wider public eye. Depending on your point of view, that is either citizen journalism, internet vigilantism, performance art, or a chaotic mixture of all three. It has certainly brought attention to the Mansell family’s situation. It has also escalated the pressure on Bricks & Minifigs and the wider franchise network.

That brings another uncomfortable question: when traditional legal routes are too expensive, slow, or inaccessible, is public pressure the only tool people feel they have left?

I don’t know the answer. I’m deeply uncomfortable with pile-ons, harassment, and businesses being review-bombed by people who do not know the full facts. I’m also deeply uncomfortable with the idea that an ordinary person might have to go viral before anyone takes their complaint seriously.

Both things can be true at once.

For now, I’m left with more questions than answers and I’m interested to see how this story develops.

I do think there are some broad lessons to be learned here.

If you are handing over a valuable collection to be sold, you need paperwork, photographs, inventory lists, serial numbers where possible, agreed valuations, insurance details, payment terms, inspection rights, and written confirmation of who is legally responsible for the goods. You need to know whether you are dealing with the brand, the franchisee, or an individual business owner. You need to know what happens if the business changes hands. And you need to be very wary of assuming that a familiar logo means a simple chain of responsibility.

For businesses, the lesson is just as clear: if people trust you with emotionally and financially valuable items, you need bulletproof processes. If the process breaks down, “that was not technically our responsibility” may be a legal defence, but it is rarely a satisfying public response.

I’m still following the story, and I’m sure more details will come out. At the moment, it feels like a messy collision between collectibles, franchise law, poor record-keeping, social media outrage, and the very human fear of being powerless against a business. We’ve probably all had times we’ve come up against a business that is not providing the best service, and it can be incredibly difficult to navigate that. I think that is why stories like this attract attention.

That’s all for this week. Thank you for reading, and have a great week ahead.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Part 343: Taking Stock

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

Update

The last week was mentally draining, but I managed to get out for some bike rides. Poppy and I continued to find a routine in Oana’s absence. Poppy has trained me well, and I can now tell when she is hungry (all the time), wanting petting and attention (all the time), or wanting to play (most of the time), or simply wanting to interrupt whatever it is I’m doing if it’s not any of the three things I’ve already mentioned (all the time).  It’s incredible how a 4kg chaos goblin can enter a household and become the most important life there. 

Oana arrived back late on Friday evening. I had a tab open with Flightradar to track her flight, and I saw it was coming pretty close to flying over our apartment. I went out on the balcony with my Flightradar app which lets you point your camera to the sky and it tells you all the info about the aircraft in the area. I located Oana’s flight but as it was in the descent phase it was only around 9,000ft and was already below the line of sight from our balcony with the apartments and hills across the river. It would have been cool to see her flight overhead, but sadly it wasn’t to be. 

It seems to have been a fairly uneventful journey despite some drama a few hours before her flight home left. The airline announced the original aircraft was not able to fly so they had replaced it. Fortunately it was not a Boeing, and was still an Airbus. 

On the subject of technology, Oana and I were talking about rewatching Deep Space Nine later in the year, but because it’s disappeared from Netflix we bought the DVD box set. Our DVD player is a PS3, and I know it’s very much a first world problem but having to get up and change the disc every few episodes is such a ballache.

This got us talking about the insane amount of technological progress our generation has seen. When I was a kid we still used floppy discs to save information. Then, in my early teens, cassette tapes were still fairly common alongside CDs. Then we had minidiscs, USB drives, DVD, and then Blu-Ray. In the space of less than twenty years we went from floppy disks holding hardly anything, to storage devices that fit inside our pocket which can hold hours of video, audio, and more. It does make you wonder where technology will take us in another twenty years.

Milka Wheels

One of the snacks I love to have in Romania with a cup of coffee is a hazelnut Milka wheel. I can’t find them in shops near me in Sheffield, but fortunately Oana had my back and brought me a massive haul of them to keep me going for a week or two:

Bike Rides

The last couple of weeks have been great for bike rides. Since Oana left on May 11th, I’ve done the following:

May 12th: 25.07km

May 14th: 17.72km

May 16th: 30.23km

May 17th: 2.51km (a short one)

May 20th: 27.06km

May 22nd: 29.69km

Then, since Oana came back we’ve done two big rides together:

May 23rd: 33.01km

May 24th: 37.09km

Also got some great pics from those rides:

The Greatest Science Fiction Shows 

I’ve noticed a few posts recently listing sci-fi shows and movies with titles like “best ever” and “greatest of all time”.  I thought I’d enter the chat and list my top ten sci-fi shows of all time, starting at number ten and working my way to the best one of all over the next ten weeks.

Note: for a show to qualify, it has to have finished.

So far, I’ve covered:

10 – The Outer Limits

9 – The X-Files

8 – Space: Above and Beyond

7 – Quantum Leap

6 – Battlestar Galactica (2004)

5 – Dark

4 – Babylon 5 

3 – Star Trek: The Next Generation 

2 – The Expanse

1 – Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

There’s a very strong argument that Star Trek: Deep Space Nine is not just the best Star Trek series, but one of the greatest science fiction shows ever made. Where Star Trek: The Original Series was famously pitched as “Wagon Train to the stars”, Deep Space Nine became something else entirely. It was The Rifleman in space. A frontier outpost on the edge of civilisation. A place where law, politics, religion, war, commerce, occupation, trauma, and morality all collided in a pressure cooker that no starship could simply warp away from at the end of the episode.

What made DS9 extraordinary was its willingness to stay still. Rather than endlessly discovering new worlds, it forced its characters to live with consequences. Bajor’s occupation by the Cardassians wasn’t some tidy bit of backstory; it lingered over everything like radiation. The station itself felt alive because history clung to every corridor. You could feel the scars.

Another reason Star Trek: Deep Space Nine has aged so remarkably well is because it rarely chained itself to the moment in which it was made. There are very few cringeworthy contemporary references, slang terms, or desperate attempts to sound “modern” that lock it into the 1990s. Instead, the writing focused on timeless themes; war, faith, friendship, trauma, politics, family, duty, and identity. That gives the show an almost novelistic quality even today. It also benefited enormously from existing in an era of long-form television, with seven seasons of 22+ episodes each allowing relationships and characters to evolve naturally over time. Modern streaming shows with eight or ten episode seasons often feel like they are sprinting from plot point to plot point, terrified to slow down. DS9 had room to breathe. It could spend time simply letting characters exist together, whether that was Bashir and O’Brien gradually becoming best friends over darts and holosuite battles, Quark and Odo circling each other with mutual irritation and reluctant respect, or Jake and Nog growing from mischievous teenagers into adults shaped by completely different experiences. Those quieter moments are what made the larger emotional payoffs feel earned.

And then there’s the cast. Not just large, but genuinely diverse in personality, ideology, and worldview. Benjamin Sisko remains one of the strongest captains in the franchise because he didn’t feel like a perfect utopian icon. He was a widower, a father, a reluctant religious figure, and eventually a wartime leader pushed into impossible moral compromises. Avery Brooks gave Sisko a gravity and intensity unlike any other Star Trek lead.

But DS9 also understood something many ensemble shows fail to grasp: background characters matter. Some of the richest arcs belonged to characters who could easily have remained set dressing in lesser hands. Nog is perhaps the greatest example. Introduced as comic relief, a Ferengi teenager getting into trouble on the Promenade, he evolves into one of the most layered characters in the franchise. His determination to join Starfleet becomes a rejection of the narrow expectations placed upon him, and over time he transforms into a capable, brave officer.

Then the show does something remarkable. It allows the cost of war to matter.

Nog’s PTSD following the loss of his leg in The Siege of AR-558 and It’s Only a Paper Moon is handled with a sensitivity and honesty that still feels ahead of its time. The holographic escapism of Vic Fontaine’s lounge becomes less about fantasy and more about trauma, grief, and recovery. Science fiction often uses war as spectacle. DS9 remembered that war breaks people.

All Time Greatest Episodes

In the Pale Moonlight may well be the finest hour in all of Star Trek. Sisko slowly compromises every principle the Federation claims to stand for in order to bring the Romulans into the Dominion War. The brilliance of the episode lies in the fact that it never offers easy absolution. Sisko’s final line, “I can live with it”, lands like a confession rather than a victory. It’s a direct challenge to the optimistic moral certainty that defined earlier Star Trek.

Likewise, Far Beyond the Stars is incredible television. Watching Sisko become Benny Russell, a Black science fiction writer in 1950s America struggling against racism and institutional prejudice, turns the entire franchise inward. It asks who gets to imagine the future. Who gets to belong in it. Avery Brooks’ breakdown at the episode’s climax is devastating.

And then there’s The Visitor. A genuine tearjerker. An episode about grief, loss, and the bond between father and son that somehow transcends science fiction entirely. Tony Todd’s performance as Jake Sisko carries such warmth and sadness that the episode becomes almost unbearable by the end. It’s one of the few episodes of television across any genre that can leave viewers emotionally wrecked decades later.

Religion is another area where DS9 distinguished itself from the rest of Star Trek. Earlier series often approached faith with a kind of detached scepticism, but DS9 treated religion as something deeply meaningful to billions of people. The Bajoran faith wasn’t portrayed as primitive superstition; it shaped politics, identity, resistance, hope, and community. Sisko’s discomfort with becoming the Emissary created a fascinating tension between Federation rationalism and spiritual belief.

The show also tackled terrorism with far more nuance than most television of its era. Kira Nerys is introduced as a former resistance fighter who absolutely committed acts the Cardassians would have called terrorism. The series refuses to give easy answers about whether violence against occupation can ever be morally justified. Instead, it forces the audience to sit in the discomfort. One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter isn’t treated as a slogan, but as a horrifying moral reality.

That willingness to embrace ambiguity is what elevates Deep Space Nine. It understood that the future would not magically solve humanity’s flaws. People would still struggle with fear, prejudice, greed, faith, trauma, and compromise. But crucially, it also believed people could still strive to be better despite all of that.

And perhaps that’s why DS9 endures so powerfully. It shows the best of humanity and what we could be, and asks how far we would go to protect it.

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: Slow Gods by Claire North.

Watching: Accused (Netflix), Rescue Me (Netflix).

Reading: Leviathan Wakes (Expanse Book 1) by James S. A. Corey

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £145,605.78.

Fuck It Fund: £22.30.

Pensions: £121,535.65.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £509,526.73.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £173,982.31. 

Total Debts: £173,982.31.

Total Wealth: £335,544.42.

Taking Stock

I’ll often use ChatGPT for research, turning to it more than Google when I want to find something out. I’ll also use it to tweak emails that I feel need to land a certain way. The great thing about ChatGPT is that you can build a rapport with it. I don’t think it’s sentient, but it certainly acts like something that has some degree of self-awareness, even if that’s something I project onto it rather than it being an internal quality.

Anyway, as well as using ChatGPT for the above I’ve also used it as a sounding board for ideas, concepts, or sense checks on things I’ve been thinking about. This brings me on to my latest project with ChatGPT. I’ve asked it to help me do a deep dive into my current life situation, covering factors like health, education, employment, finances, and so on. 

I’ve prompted it to almost interrogate me on where I’m at, how I feel about the subject at hand, and what I want to do to improve it. So far it’s helped crystallise some things I’ve been thinking over, and I think it’s been a useful exercise. I’m nowhere near finished with it, and I’m curious as to where this will take me. 

The main thing about using LLMs like ChatGPT is that they are only as good as the prompts you give.

FIRE

One thing that has come about from my interactions with ChatGPT is that FI is really not that far away, and that I’m probably overestimating how much money I need to retire. Many of my hobbies and interests don’t cost a lot of money, relatively speaking. But then, we live in a world that has Lego.

Some number crunching suggests Oana and I could have a moderately comfortable life with £28,000 net income per annum. More would be better, obviously, but £28,000 would be enough for a simple life with a few luxuries. 

On a monthly basis we’re talking about £2,334. On a minimum wage job, you could work 975 hours a year and not exceed the standard tax free allowance. This is roughly 19 hours per week. Two people doing this, i.e. Oana and I would thus bring in approx £2k per month.

These aren’t exact figures, but just some quick mental calculations. With the investments we’ve got supplementing any income brought in from work, we’re not far away at all. 

That’s all for this week. Thank you for reading and I hope you have a great week ahead.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Part 342: Workplace Culture


Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. This week I talk about workplace culture, and the runner up entry on my best sci-fi list.

Update

It’s just been myself and Poppy this week as Oana has been back in Romania visiting her Gran. In her absence, Poppy and I have gotten into a routine. She asks for food and I feed her. She asks to sit in my lap and I let her. I try to get anything done that doesn’t involve feeding or petting Pops, and we have a disagreement, and then compromise by doing exactly what Pops wanted me to do. 

I’ve managed to get a couple of bike rides in but the weather has not been great. Other than work, chilling with Pops, and the occasional bike ride, I’ve been binge watching Rescue Me on Netflix.

I first saw Rescue Me on its original run back in the days of Sky One. I enjoyed it at the time but never got to finish the whole series. Now, the entire run is on Netflix. The show is coarse, blunt, not politically correct in any way, but that makes the characters believable. These people are complex with you hating them in one scene and then feeling for them in the next. The dialogue is also top notch. Also, there is not a single chance that the show would ever be made today.

One thing that frustrates me with a lot of fiction now is that critics often confuse the words and actions of characters with the words and beliefs of those writing the script. I could write a character that was a complete misogynist. That does not make me a misogynist. It means I’m writing a character as part of a story to entertain, horrify, educate, or to get people thinking. 

Workplace Culture

One of the strange things about work is that when people talk about a “good team”, they often mean completely different things. For some people, a good workplace is one where everyone gets along, has a laugh together, and the atmosphere feels easy and relaxed. For others, it’s about competence. They can tolerate awkwardness, bluntness, or even people they personally dislike, so long as the people around them are reliable and know what they’re doing. Then there’s the third category: respect. The idea that you don’t necessarily have to like someone, but you do need to respect them professionally and trust their judgement.

It’s something I’ve been thinking about recently after a few conversations with friends about their own workplaces. Some are in environments where everybody is pleasant enough, but nothing actually functions properly. Others work with highly capable people who are also utterly exhausting to be around. And some seem trapped in offices where there’s neither competence nor respect, just politics, ego, and survival instincts.

The older I get, the more I think competence is probably the foundation everything else rests on. A workplace can survive a lack of friendship. It can survive people being a bit distant, socially awkward, or not particularly warm. What it struggles to survive is incompetence. Few things drain morale faster than watching capable people repeatedly clean up the mess created by people who either cannot or will not do their jobs properly. Over time, resentment builds. Good people burn out. Standards collapse. Cynicism spreads.

Competence on its own also isn’t enough.

Most people have probably worked with somebody who was brilliant at their job but impossible to deal with. The person who treats every conversation like an IQ test. The colleague who mistakes arrogance for leadership. The “high performer” who leaves a trail of tension and misery behind them everywhere they go. Eventually, even competence stops compensating for behaviour that poisons the atmosphere around them.

That’s where respect comes in, and I think respect is often misunderstood. Respect doesn’t mean blind agreement or forced corporate positivity. It means believing the people around you are acting in good faith. It means trusting that they’ll pull their weight, communicate honestly and clearly, and not throw others under the bus to protect themselves. You can disagree with somebody constantly and still deeply respect them.

Ironically, workplaces obsessed with everybody “getting along” sometimes end up being the most dysfunctional of all. Difficult conversations never happen because people are terrified of conflict. Poor performance gets ignored because managers don’t want to upset anyone. Entire departments become passive-aggressive pressure cookers where frustration simmers beneath forced smiles and LinkedIn-style positivity.

I’ve come to think that friendship at work is more of a bonus than a requirement. Some of the best colleagues I’ve had were not people I’d necessarily socialise with outside work. But they were dependable. Intelligent. Honest. Calm under pressure. You knew where you stood with them. That matters more than whether you’d go for a coffee together.

At the same time, humans aren’t machines. You spend enormous chunks of your life working, and if the environment around you is hostile, petty, or emotionally draining, it takes a toll. There’s a reason toxic workplaces can wreck people’s mental health even when the actual job itself isn’t particularly difficult.

Maybe the ideal balance is this: competence earns respect, and respect creates the conditions where people can eventually get along naturally. Trying to force the order the other way round rarely works.

Ultimately, most people don’t need their colleagues to become their best friends. They just want to work with people they can trust. One thing that sits underneath all of this, and probably determines whether any workplace functions properly at all, is communication.

You can have intelligent people, technically capable people, even decent people, but if communication breaks down then everything else eventually follows it into the abyss. Confusion spreads. Assumptions replace clarity. Small mistakes become major problems because nobody spoke up early enough to stop them. Clear communication. Honest communication. These things are vital.

It’s remarkable how many workplace problems are not actually caused by malice, incompetence, or laziness, but by people operating with completely different understandings of what is happening. One person thinks something is urgent. Another thinks it can wait until next week. Someone assumes a task has been picked up by somebody else. A manager thinks they communicated expectations clearly when in reality they delivered a vague stream of word salad that meant different things to different people.

And then there’s the other side of it: workplaces where people become afraid to communicate honestly.

Once people start worrying that asking questions will make them look stupid, or that admitting mistakes will get them punished, communication becomes distorted. People hide problems instead of raising them. They say they understand things when they don’t. Meetings become theatre performances where everyone nods along pretending alignment exists when it absolutely does not.

The irony is that strong communication often matters more in stressful environments than easy ones. Anybody can communicate when things are calm and going well. The real test is whether people can still communicate clearly under pressure, when deadlines are collapsing, systems are failing, or clients are furious. That’s usually when you discover whether a workplace is actually functional or merely pretending to be.

Some of the smoothest teams I’ve ever seen weren’t necessarily made up of the smartest people in the room. They were made up of people who kept each other informed. They documented things properly. They asked questions early. They clarified expectations. They admitted uncertainty instead of bluffing confidence. That creates trust surprisingly quickly.

Bad communication also creates an exhausting amount of emotional friction. People start reading hidden meanings into everything. Tone gets misinterpreted. Minor issues spiral because nobody addresses them directly. Entire workplace cultures can become built around gossip and speculation simply because leadership refuses to communicate openly.

And perhaps most importantly, good communication reduces anxiety.

There’s a huge psychological difference between being busy and being confused. Most people can handle pressure if they understand what’s happening and what is expected of them. What destroys morale is uncertainty. Constant mixed messages. Contradictory instructions. Silence. Ambiguity. Feeling like you’re trying to navigate through fog while being judged for not moving quickly enough.

A surprising amount of “work stress” is actually communication stress.

The workplaces people tend to remember positively are often not the ones with beanbags, pizza Fridays, or endless corporate slogans about culture. They’re the places where people spoke plainly, expectations were clear, problems were addressed directly, and nobody felt like they had to become a mind reader just to survive the week.

One piece of workplace advice that sounds sensible on the surface but falls apart the moment you think about it properly is the classic line:

“If you’re unsure, ask.”

You’ll normally hear this immediately after somebody has made a mistake.

The problem is that it completely misunderstands how many mistakes actually happen.

Most people do not make mistakes because they are sitting there paralysed with uncertainty while consciously choosing not to ask for help. They make mistakes because they are confident they already understand what they’re doing. The issue isn’t uncertainty. The issue is certainty attached to the wrong conclusion.

If somebody genuinely knows they don’t understand something, they’ll often ask. Or at least they’ll recognise there’s a gap in their knowledge. The dangerous situations are usually the ones where people don’t realise they’ve misunderstood in the first place.

That’s what makes the advice so frustratingly shallow. It sounds wise, but it’s almost useless as a preventative measure because it assumes people have accurate awareness of their own misunderstandings. In reality, human beings are terrible at this. Entire industries are built around people confidently doing the wrong thing.

You see it constantly in workplaces. Somebody follows a process incorrectly because they interpreted an instruction differently. Someone assumes a task works one way because that’s how it worked in their previous role. Someone uses the wrong terminology, misunderstands a system, or draws a logical conclusion that turns out not to match reality. 

Afterwards they get hit with:

“Well, you should have asked.”

But ask what, exactly?

How do you ask about something you don’t know you’ve misunderstood?

It’s a bit like telling somebody who got lost while driving that they should have checked the map earlier. True, technically, but only useful if they already suspected they were going the wrong way.

I sometimes think workplaces underestimate how much hidden knowledge exists inside experienced teams. People who have done a role for years forget how much of their understanding is instinctive, implied, or absorbed informally over time. Processes that feel “obvious” to them are often anything but obvious to somebody newer. Then when misunderstandings happen, organisations frame it as an individual failure rather than a communication failure.

The best workplaces tend to understand this. They don’t just tell people to ask questions. They actively create systems that reduce ambiguity in the first place. They encourage people to explain reasoning, not just instructions. They normalise checking assumptions. They accept that misunderstandings are inevitable whenever humans communicate complex information.

Because ultimately, competence is not about never making mistakes. It’s about building environments where mistakes are caught early, discussed openly, and learned from properly instead of reduced to one-line clichés after the fact.

The Greatest Science Fiction Shows 

I’ve noticed a few posts recently listing sci-fi shows and movies with titles like “best ever” and “greatest of all time”.  I thought I’d enter the chat and list my top ten sci-fi shows of all time, starting at number ten and working my way to the best one of all over the next ten weeks.

Note: for a show to qualify, it has to have finished.

So far, I’ve covered:

10 – The Outer Limits

9 – The X-Files

8 – Space: Above and Beyond

7 – Quantum Leap

6 – Battlestar Galactica (2004)

5 – Dark

4 – Babylon 5 

3 – Star Trek: The Next Generation 

2 – The Expanse

One of the things that makes The Expanse so special is that it succeeds on two completely different levels. The television series is excellent in its own right, while the book series is able to tell the complete story in full. That distinction matters, because the show ultimately ends with threads still left hanging after its cancellation, whereas the novels are able to carry the story through to its intended conclusion. In many ways, they feel like companion pieces rather than direct replacements for one another.

Now I know what you are thinking; David, didn’t you say that a show has to be complete to be considered for this list?

Yes. Yes, I did. However, one thing you need to understand about The Expanse is that there are nine full novels and a lot of novellas. The core nine books are often considered to be a trilogy of trilogies. The show ended on season six (book six), and anyone who knows what is coming after that will probably agree that it was a natural place to stop if you were not going to adapt the final trilogy of books. So, on that logic I’m including The Expanse on the basis that it did finish at an end point of sorts.

The television adaptation deserves enormous credit for what it achieved. Few science fiction shows have ever managed world-building on this scale while still making the setting feel believable. Yes, there are fantastical elements at the heart of the story, most notably the protomolecule itself, but outside of that one great unknowable force, the universe of The Expanse feels startlingly plausible. 

Having the jumping off point for the story being a fantastical factor like the protomolecule is not unusual in great sci-fi. Many of the best sci-fi stories have an element which is exceptional, acting as a spark for the story; the impossible dust storm in The Martian, or the Monolith in 2001, or astrophage in Project Hail Mary, to name just a few. 

Anyway, the politics, economics, military tensions, resource shortages, and cultural divides all feel like natural extensions of humanity’s current trajectory. Earth, Mars, and the Belt are not just locations; they are societies shaped by geography, scarcity, and generations of history.

The attention to realism is what elevates the show above most of its peers. Space is not treated like a magical ocean where ships drift around like naval vessels from the eighteenth century. Ships flip and burn to decelerate. Combat happens at enormous distances. Gravity matters. Acceleration matters. Vacuum exposure is terrifying. Even the physical differences between Earthers, Martians, and Belters are considered carefully, with Belters shaped by generations of low gravity in ways that make them physically distinct from the people of Earth. It is science fiction grounded in consequences.

That grounding makes the world feel tangible in a way very few shows manage. The Expanse does not feel like fantasy wearing a science fiction costume. It feels like a future humanity that genuinely evolved from our present day. Strip away the protomolecule, and much of what remains feels uncomfortably achievable within the next few centuries. Climate collapse, overcrowded cities, proxy wars over resources, corporate influence, and widening inequality are all recognisably human problems carried forward into a larger solar system.

Another thing The Expanse deserves immense praise for is its diversity and inclusivity, because it demonstrates how effortlessly representation works when it is treated as a natural part of the world rather than a lecture aimed at the audience. The cast is wonderfully varied, but the characters are never reduced to checkboxes or slogans. They are fully realised people with strengths, flaws, loyalties, prejudices, ambitions, and contradictions.

Chrisjen Avasarala is not compelling because she is a woman in power; she is compelling because she is intelligent, ruthless, exhausted, funny, and terrifyingly competent. Amos Burton is not memorable because of any demographic characteristic; he is memorable because he is psychologically damaged, deeply loyal, and morally complex in ways that make him simultaneously unsettling and strangely endearing. Drummer, Naomi, Bobbie, Miller, and Holden all feel like complete human beings first and foremost.

That is what modern television so often forgets. Diversity is not what audiences reject. Audiences reject shallow writing. The Expanse proves that you can have an enormously inclusive cast while still prioritising character, storytelling, and world-building above all else. Representation works best when it is woven naturally into the fabric of the setting instead of constantly pointing at itself demanding applause.

Ultimately, The Expanse stands as one of the finest science fiction series ever produced because it understands something fundamental about the genre. Great science fiction is not really about spaceships or future technology. It is about humanity. About politics, fear, tribalism, survival, curiosity, and the uncomfortable possibility that no matter how far we travel into the stars, we may still drag our oldest flaws along with us.

A lot of people have compared The Expanse to Game of Thrones, with the authors of the former having worked for the author of the latter, and all three having been part of the same tabletop gaming group. Many of the elements of political intrigue are present in both stories, with a fair few other similarities which I will not spoil.  

If you like thoughtful sci-fi, and something that demands your attention, please do check out The Expanse.

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: Slow Gods by Claire North.

Watching: Accused (Netflix), Rescue Me (Netflix).

Reading: Leviathan Wakes (Expanse Book 1) by James S. A. Corey

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £144,836.74.

Fuck It Fund: £22.30.

Pensions: £121,370.29.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £508,592.33.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £173,982.31. 

Total Debts: £173,982.31.

Total Wealth: £334,610.02.

Although I’ve not been able to invest much of my own money recently, my investments continue to grow. I feel a bit like a broken record now, but I really need to start bringing some serious money home. I still believe I have what it takes to make this money, but doing so in the mortgage sector is time consuming, in that there can be a lengthy lead time between doing the work and getting paid.

That’s all for this week, thanks for reading.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Parts 340 & 341: The Great Spring Reset – Long Rides, Canal Walks, Coffee Discoveries, and the Deep Clean From Hell

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

Update

The last couple of weeks have been one of those strange combinations of refreshing outdoorsy living and then absolute domestic warfare. One minute we were cruising through the sunshine on long bike rides feeling like we had our lives together, and the next we were in a lot of pain at midnight trying to vacuum behind furniture that probably hasn’t moved since the Bronze Age.

Anyway, let’s start with the good stuff.

On April 26th, Oana and I completed our longest ride so far, clocking in at over 46km. For seasoned cyclists that probably sounds fairly modest, but for us it felt enormous. The route took us through Rotherham, Boston Park, Waverley, Treeton, and eventually back home, and by the end of it we were absolutely spent in the best possible way. We did some insane hill climbing on our bikes, and just a few months ago we would have found this impossible. There’s a proper sense of achievement when you reach the top of a steep hill, or at least there is once your breathing returns to normal and the black spots in your vision go away.

There’s something addictive about gradually pushing your distance further. Rides that once felt impossible slowly become normal, and then before you know it you’re casually discussing whether another few kilometres can be squeezed into the route. Sheffield and the surrounding areas are great for cycling too. You can go from urban industrial scenery to open green spaces in just a few minutes. There’s all sorts of hidden routes and paths through old industrial areas which then bring you into areas of greenery and wildlife. There’s also the Peak District right on our doorstep. 

A couple of days after the big ride we slowed things down a bit and spent time with my Dad for his birthday. We called at his house first to drop off his present, a canvas print of The Scream, before heading out for a long canal walk in the sunshine.

There wasn’t a detailed plan as such. We had a nice walk out to Meadowhall and stopped for lunch before heading back. Walking along the canal is so peaceful and relaxing, and at this time of the year it’s just green everywhere, and after what felt like an endless grey winter it finally feels like spring has properly arrived.

We’ve also done a few more group bike rides recently and met some genuinely cool people along the way. One of the nicest things about cycling is how quickly it creates conversation. You can start a ride knowing nobody and end it discussing routes, bikes, cafés, injuries, weather forecasts, and whether that hill “was actually that bad” with complete strangers.

One particularly good discovery was Kilnfolk Coffee, which one of the ride leaders took us all to. Oana and I knew right away we would return there. They make their own pottery and actually serve the drinks and food in it, which gives the whole place a really distinctive feel. I don’t care what anyone says but the mug you are drinking from is just as important as the quality of the coffee. There’s something satisfying about drinking coffee from a mug that clearly wasn’t mass-produced in a faceless factory somewhere. Independent coffee shops just have more personality, and places like that make areas feel alive.

Then came the deep clean.

Dear God. Some cleans leave you tired. Some leave you with PTSD.

Over two days, Oana and I embarked on what can only be described as a full-scale archaeological excavation of the apartment. The main issue is that we have an absurd amount of Lego, ornaments, books, models, and assorted decorative chaos. Cleaning normally involves dusting around things. This time, every single item had to come off shelves individually so both the item itself and the surface beneath it could be cleaned properly.

Which sounds manageable in theory.

In practice, it became a 24-hour endurance event spread across two days of more than twelve hours each. Shelves emptied. Units dragged away from walls. Bookcases moved. Dust discovered in places that defy physics. Entire ecosystems probably collapsed behind some furniture.

At one point I genuinely think we entered a state of shared cleaning delirium where time lost all meaning. Darkness took me, and I strayed out of thought and time. Stars wheeled overhead, and everyday was as long as the life age of the Earth. 

Yes I went full Gandalf there. Yes I might be exaggerating a little. 

Once you get deep enough into a task like that, stopping almost feels worse than continuing. You become committed to the suffering. By the end, the apartment looked fantastic, but psychologically I’m not sure either of us will ever fully recover. Some wounds cut too deep. I believe we were changed by the experience.

Such is life.

Protest Votes, Empty Slogans, and the Myth of “Taking Back Control”

One thing that’s genuinely baffled me following the local elections is how many people seem convinced that electing Reform councillors is somehow going to fundamentally reshape Britain.

I keep asking a very simple question:

What specifically are Reform councillors going to do at local council level that will materially improve people’s lives?

And so far, I’ve never had a proper answer.

Because when you strip away the slogans, most of the talking points aren’t actually about local government at all. “Stop the boats.” “Take back our country.” “Britain is full.” These are national political issues tied to Parliament, border policy, asylum systems, international law, and central government funding.

Your local councillor is mostly dealing with things like bins, planning applications, road maintenance, libraries, social care, local budgets, and whether the pothole outside Greggs finally gets filled in before the DFS sale finally ends.

That disconnect fascinates me.

There’s this growing tendency in politics for people to vote emotionally rather than practically. Local elections become a giant venting mechanism for broader anger about the economy, housing, immigration, or cultural change. But anger alone isn’t a governing strategy.

And if someone is standing for office, I think it’s reasonable to ask:

Are they actually qualified to run a council?

Do they understand local government finance?

Do they know how social care funding works?

Can they navigate planning law?

Do they understand transport policy?

Or are they simply good at repeating slogans people already agree with?

Because shouting “Britain needs saving” is not the same thing as being able to manage a council budget.

What also strikes me is the strange nostalgia underpinning so much of this rhetoric. Many of the same people talking about the “good old days” also celebrate Britain’s role in standing against fascism and authoritarian nationalism during the Second World War. Yet at the same time, there’s increasing hostility towards outsiders, constant suspicion of immigrants, and a narrative that Britain is somehow being “taken away” from “real” British people.

The irony is difficult to ignore.

And before someone inevitably says “you can discuss immigration without being racist”, yes, obviously you can. Immigration policy is a legitimate topic for debate. Housing pressures, infrastructure strain, wage stagnation, and public service demand are all real issues worthy of discussion.

But too often the conversation stops being about policy and starts becoming about identity, resentment, and finding someone else to blame for problems that are actually far more complicated.

That’s the part I find depressing.

Because fixing Britain, or any country for that matter, is hard. Often, the things that need fixing, like the NHS, social housing, care for the elderly, and so on, will take at least a decade of focused effort.

It involves long-term investment, infrastructure, education, housing reform, economic growth, functioning public services, and politicians willing to tell voters uncomfortable truths.

It’s much easier to just shout slogans.

Murder Trial Tonight IV – Death of a Landlord

On Friday evening we went to our second Murder Trial Tonight event. It was busier than the first one we attended, Murder Trial Tonight III – The Doorstep Case.  We were a bit put out when we were told we couldn’t bring our water bottles in, but in fairness it was our mistake. The audience was generally well behaved apart from some idiot behind us who kept talking. At least three times people told him to STFU. I think he was drunk or something and the staff really should have sorted it. 

It’s a difficult one when someone is being disruptive because you don’t want to be even more disruptive trying to resolve the issue. It’s rare in my experience for someone to be disruptive and, when confronted about it, for the situation not to escalate.

Overall it was a good time but unlike our previous attempt we got the wrong verdict. I’m not going to spoil it in case anyone reading here is going to a showing somewhere else in the country. But yeah, Oana and I called it wrong.

Sheffield Wednesday

It’s finally happened. The Chansiri era is over; an era which saw the reputation of the club dragged as low as its ever been. Finally, the club is out of administration and under new ownership with Arise Capital Partners LLC taking control on May 2nd. It was a full party atmosphere at Hillsborough despite the club already being relegated. 33,750 turned out in the largest attendance in the Championship all season. Everything seemed to come together as we got our first win at home all season on the last day.

Next season we will compete in League One. We’ve seen a fair bit of League One since relegation from the Premier League. Hopefully, this will be our last relegation for a long, long time.

The Greatest Science Fiction Shows 

I’ve noticed a few posts recently listing sci-fi shows and movies with titles like “best ever” and “greatest of all time”.  I thought I’d enter the chat and list my top ten sci-fi shows of all time, starting at number ten and working my way to the best one of all over the next ten weeks.

Note: for a show to qualify, it has to have finished.

So far, I’ve covered:

10 – The Outer Limits

9 – The X-Files

8 – Space: Above and Beyond

7 – Quantum Leap

6 – Battlestar Galactica (2004)

5 – Dark

4 – Babylon 5

3 – Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987 – 1994)

It’s difficult to overstate just how important Star Trek: The Next Generation was, not just for science fiction, but for television as a whole. For many people, TNG is Star Trek. It took the optimistic vision of Gene Roddenberry’s original series and expanded it into something richer, more philosophical, and far more emotionally sophisticated.

But looking back now, it’s easy to forget just how rocky the beginning actually was. The early seasons of The Next Generation are, to put it kindly, inconsistent.

The show had the enormous burden of following the original Star Trek, and early on it often felt unsure of what it wanted to be. The writing could be awkward, the tone uneven, and some episodes were genuinely dreadful. Characters were underdeveloped, dialogue could feel stiff, and Roddenberry’s insistence that humanity had largely evolved beyond interpersonal conflict sometimes made interactions feel strangely sterile.

Season One was poor with arguably one of the worst episodes of television ever made; Code of Honor, with Jonathan Frakes (Commander Riker) referring to it as a “racist piece of shit.”

The phrase “growing the beard” actually comes from The Next Generation. Much like Happy Days had “jumping the shark,” TNG developed its own phrase to describe a show suddenly finding its identity and dramatically improving in quality. The term refers to Commander Riker growing a beard in season two, around the same time the series itself started to mature.

By season three, The Next Generation had transformed into something remarkable.

The characters felt more natural. The writers understood their strengths. The stories became more ambitious, philosophical, and emotionally resonant. What had once felt like a shaky revival suddenly became one of the greatest science-fiction series ever made.

Q Who? and the Arrival of the Borg

One of the defining turning points came with “Q Who?”

Until that point, many of the threats in TNG still felt manageable within the familiar Star Trek framework. Then Q, the omnipotent trickster entity, forcibly hurls the Enterprise across the galaxy and introduces the crew to something entirely different:

The Borg.

The episode completely changes the tone of the series. The Borg are not interested in negotiation, ideology, or conquest in the traditional sense. They simply consume and assimilate. Individuality means nothing to them. Entire civilizations are stripped apart and absorbed into the Collective.

What makes the Borg terrifying is their inevitability. They cannot be reasoned with. They cannot be intimidated. And for perhaps the first time in TNG, the Enterprise encounters an enemy it cannot outthink or outfight.

It’s a moment that fundamentally alters the series, introducing vulnerability into a universe that had often felt relatively safe.

The Best of Both Worlds and the Modern Cliffhanger

If “Q Who?” introduced the Borg, then “The Best of Both Worlds” cemented them as one of the greatest villains in television history.

The two-part story sees Captain Picard captured and assimilated by the Borg, transformed into Locutus, the human voice of the Collective. Starfleet faces annihilation as the Borg cube advances towards Earth, effortlessly destroying fleets sent to stop it.

And then came one of the most famous cliffhangers ever broadcast. As the Enterprise races after the cube, it finally catches up and prepares to fire an experimental weapon which is hoped will be enough to destroy the Borg. On the viewscreen, the Enterprise crew are met with the image of Locutus. 

Commander Riker gives the order knowing it could kill their Captain:

“Mr Worf… fire.”

Cut to black.

At the time, audiences had to wait months to discover what happened next. It’s difficult now, in the age of streaming and binge-watching, to fully appreciate the impact that moment had. While cliffhangers obviously existed before TNG, The Best of Both Worlds helped establish the modern prestige-TV style cliffhanger, one designed not simply as a gimmick, but as a genuine emotional and narrative gut punch.

The episode also fundamentally changed Picard. His assimilation leaves lasting psychological scars, proving that events in TNG could have permanent consequences rather than resetting neatly each week.

The Show at Its Best

What ultimately made The Next Generation exceptional was not action or spectacle, but its ability to explore ideas through character-driven storytelling.

The Measure of a Man

“The Measure of a Man” is perhaps the definitive TNG episode. The story centres on whether Data, an android officer, is legally considered property or a sentient being with rights.

At its core, the episode asks one of science fiction’s great questions:

What does it actually mean to be alive?

Rather than relying on technobabble or action, the episode unfolds largely as a courtroom drama, with Picard arguing that denying Data autonomy would reduce him to little more than a slave.

It’s thoughtful, philosophical, and deeply human, despite centring on a machine. The tension is raised further as Commander Riker is forced to argue the case against Data, with the threat that if he doesn’t perform his duties, Starfleet will rule against Data anyway.

Yesterday’s Enterprise

“Yesterday’s Enterprise” explores an alternate timeline where the Federation is locked in a brutal war with the Klingons. The arrival of the Enterprise-C from the past fractures reality itself. In the past, the old Enterrpise had been destroyed protecting a Klingon colony and that heroic sacrifice had convinced the Klingons that the Federation was honourable and that peace would be mutually beneficial. With that sacrifice no longer part of history, war erupted.

The episode stands out because it reveals how fragile the peaceful Federation actually is. Remove one pivotal historical event, and the optimistic future of Star Trek collapses into endless conflict.

It also gives Tasha Yar a much better send off. In season one, Yar was the original security officer on the ship, but the actress was not happy with the role and wanted out. So, Yar was written out of the show in a pointless death. With history having changed, this allowed the writers to bring Yar back and give the character the ending she deserved. Yar transfers to the Enterprise-C as it goes back in time to complete it’s suicidal mission to protect the Klingon colony. 

Tapestry

“Tapestry” is essentially It’s a Wonderful Life filtered through science fiction.

After Picard dies, Q gives him the opportunity to revisit pivotal moments from his past and avoid mistakes that shaped his life, including the reckless bar fight that resulted in his artificial heart.

What Picard discovers, however, is that removing failure and risk from his life also removes the experiences that made him who he is.

It’s a brilliant meditation on regret, identity, and personal growth. In a great bit of writing, it also calls back to a previous episode where Picard mentions laughing when he sees the knife sticking out of his chest. He never knew why he did that. Fast forward to this episode, and Q gives him the chance to go back to that moment and get stabbed. Picard goes through with it, and seeing himself with the knife in his chest, he knows he’s going back to his proper life.

The Inner Light

Widely regarded as one of the greatest television episodes ever made, “The Inner Light” strips away almost everything associated with Star Trek.

Picard is struck by an alien probe and lives an entire lifetime in the span of minutes, experiencing decades as another man on a long-dead world.

He falls in love. Raises children. Grows old.

Then wakes up back on the Enterprise.

The episode is devastating because it’s fundamentally about memory, loss, and the fleeting nature of existence. Picard returns physically unchanged, but emotionally transformed by a life that, from everyone else’s perspective, never happened.

The final moment, where he quietly plays the flute he learned in that other life, is one of the most haunting endings in science fiction.

All Good Things…

The series finale, “All Good Things…”, is a rare achievement: an ending that genuinely lives up to the show it concludes.

Picard becomes unstuck in time, shifting between the past, present, and future while attempting to prevent a temporal catastrophe orchestrated, or perhaps merely observed, by Q.

The episode acts as both a celebration of the series and a reflection on everything it stood for: curiosity, growth, exploration, and humanity’s potential.

And then there’s the ending.

Picard finally joins the senior staff poker game, something he had always kept himself slightly apart from. As the cards are dealt, he remarks:

“I should have done this a long time ago.”

It’s a small moment, but a perfect one. After years of commanding the Enterprise, Picard finally allows himself to simply be part of the family.

At its best, The Next Generation wasn’t really about technology or aliens.

It was about ideas. It treated science fiction not as escapism, but as a way of exploring philosophy, ethics, and the human condition.

And while the first couple of seasons may have stumbled badly at times, the show eventually grew into something extraordinary.

Or, to put it another way: It grew the beard.

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: 

Watching: Accused (Netflix).

Reading: Leviathan Wakes (Expanse Book 1) by James S. A. Corey

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £143,085.99.

Fuck It Fund: £22.30.

Pensions: £120,174.13.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £505,645.42.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £173,982.31. 

Total Debts: £173,982.31.

Total Wealth: £331,663.11.

There’s a strange contradiction in how we treat money in Britain. We’re surrounded by it constantly; adverts for cars, holidays, kitchens, investment apps, luxury watches, property programmes, finance gurus, side hustles and “passive income” everywhere you look. Yet the moment ordinary people start openly discussing their own finances honestly, it suddenly becomes taboo. We’re expected to quietly struggle in private, quietly succeed in private, and never really say what’s going on behind the curtain.

One of the things I’ve tried to do with this blog is normalise those conversations. To talk openly about debt, pensions, savings, mortgages, financial anxiety, financial mistakes, and the slow, often unglamorous process of improving your situation over time. Because the reality is that most people are winging it. Most of us were never taught this stuff properly. And when nobody talks about money honestly, people assume everyone else has magically figured it out while they alone are failing.

But there’s an uncomfortable side to this openness too. The more transparent you are about your financial journey, the more people can track your progress in real time. If you spend years talking publicly about overpayments, investing, budgeting, building an ISA, or becoming financially secure, eventually some people stop seeing the lessons and start seeing the scoreboard. What began as “this is useful and relatable” can quietly become “must be nice.”

And that’s where things can get awkward. Because people are generally supportive of financial openness right up until visible improvement enters the picture. Struggle is relatable. Progress is harder for some people to process. Especially in a culture where money is emotionally loaded with ideas about class, fairness, success, luck, and self-worth. You can almost feel the point where some readers stop seeing you as “one of us” and start mentally placing you into another category entirely.

The irony is that the entire point of talking openly about money is to help demystify it. To show that financial stability usually isn’t one magical event or crypto jackpot or inheritance cheque. More often it’s years of boring consistency, small decisions repeated over and over, mistakes corrected slowly, and learning things the hard way. But once people only see the end result, they can miss the years of anxiety, spreadsheets, sacrifices, second-guessing, and delayed gratification that got you there.

I still think these conversations matter though. Probably more than ever. Because silence around money doesn’t protect people; it isolates them. It keeps people ashamed of debt, ignorant of pensions, scared of investing, and convinced everyone else is doing better than they are. Honest conversations about money can genuinely change lives. Even if, occasionally, they also make people uncomfortable.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Posting Schedule Update

After years of Sunday morning posts, I’m making a small change to the schedule.

Going forward, new posts on Mortgage Advisor on FIRE will now go live at 7pm (GMT) on Sundays instead of 9am.

Part of the reason is practical. Writing and scheduling posts for early Sunday mornings has basically meant sacrificing chunks of my Saturday evenings, and honestly, I’d rather spend that time relaxing with Oana, watching sci-fi, or doing literally anything other than fighting with WordPress formatting at 11pm when my eyes are closing.

Sunday evening just feels like a better fit all round. A quieter time to sit down, unwind, and read something properly before the chaos of Monday begins.

So from now on:
New posts. Sundays. 7pm.

So please check back in approximately ten hours.

Part 339: Are we finally getting some sun?

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

Weekly Update

It’s been a tiring week with early starts each day. On Monday I had an appointment with a consultant about my elbow, which has been painful since the summer of 2022. Since then I’ve seen several consultants and physios privately and on the NHS. No one can identify the cause. I’m not talking about a little ache here and there, but pain that can keep me awake or wake me up. It’s not constant, but it does impact on my quality of life and stops me from training at the gym.

Anyway, pretty much the first thing that the consultant said was that I shouldn’t be in her clinic, which is always a good start. She was friendly enough but is having to refer me to someone else. It’s only been four years at this point so what’s a few more weeks of waiting. 

From Tuesday through Friday Oana completed an online course which required a 7am start. I offered to wake up and make her breakfast whilst she got set up for the meetings each day. After making breakfast, I had a little snooze until it was my time to start working. I think Poppy has gotten used to this new routine as she would come and sleep on me whilst I was snoozing on the sofa. Oana got a few pics of us sleeping and made a collage:

Poppy really is the sweetest cat.

On Friday evening we took part in one of our group bike rides. Roughly 30 of us rode all around the city centre and ventured out towards Heeley. It was good fun, although at one point I felt a little off colour. The group ride started at 19:00 but we went out for a ride before. Remember this is coming off a week of very early starts and not much sleep. At about 18:30 I felt absolutely done in. I did not think I’d manage the ride. We pushed on and stopped at a Japanese take away and had some chicken katsu and gyozas. Washed down with some coke, the drink, not the powder, I felt much better. 

The group ride was longer than normal and by the end of the night we had done over 30km. We got home, showered, ate, slept, and then woke up Saturday morning for another bike ride. This time we completed 37km as we rode through woods, along the river and canal, and by fields of horses, sheep, and cows. We stopped for some chips to refuel, and a bit later for an iced coffee. It was a great day out in the sun.

Our evening meal on Saturday was a complete clusterfuck. I tried to make a roux and it just didn’t work. So, instead of a home made mac’n’cheese we ended up with a pasta salad. It’s our first cooking fail in a while but I hate wasting ingredients.

The Greatest Science Fiction Shows 

I’ve noticed a few posts recently listing sci-fi shows and movies with titles like “best ever” and “greatest of all time”.  I thought I’d enter the chat and list my top ten sci-fi shows of all time, starting at number ten and working my way to the best one of all over the next ten weeks.

Note: for a show to qualify, it has to have finished.

So far, I’ve covered:

10 – The Outer Limits

9 – The X-Files

8 – Space: Above and Beyond

7 – Quantum Leap

6 – Battlestar Galactica (2004)

5 – Dark

4 – Babylon 5 (1994 – 1998)

Babylon 5 (1994–1998)

Babylon 5 is one of the most important science-fiction series ever made, not because it had the biggest budget, the most polished effects, or even the best acting, but because it fundamentally changed how stories could be told on television.

Created by J. Michael Straczynski, the show was conceived from the outset as a five-year novel for television. That alone sets it apart. At a time when most sci-fi was episodic, Babylon 5 committed to long-form storytelling, where events, decisions, and character arcs would unfold over years rather than being neatly resolved in a single episode. Some scenes in the very first episode were not paid off until almost the very end of the show.

The result is a series that feels less like traditional TV and more like a carefully constructed narrative with a beginning, middle, and end.

The Setting

The setting is deceptively simple: a massive space station located in neutral territory, designed to serve as a diplomatic hub for multiple alien civilizations. The Babylon Project was the result of the Earth-Minbari war; a devastating conflict resulting from a horrific mistake during first contact. An Earth task force opened fire on a Minbari convoy not realising the Minbari custom of approaching with gun ports open was a sign of openness and respect, and not a sign of imminent attack. The Earth commander opened fire and, in a further stroke of bad luck, killed the leader of the Minbari civilisation. 

The Minbari embarked on a war of genocide, and because they were much older and more advanced than humanity, it was a slaughter. As the war drew to a close, the Minbari had pushed humanity all the way back to Earth, and as they had the planet surrounded, the Minbari surrendered. The mystery of this surrender was the focus of much of the first season of Babylon 5

The Station – Babylon 5

Babylon 5 is a place where empires negotiate and manipulate, and ancient forces quietly move into position. At the centre of it all are the station’s commanders, first Jeffrey Sinclair, later John Sheridan, and a diverse group of officers, diplomats, and civilians trying to hold together a fragile peace.

However, as the intro to third season states; “The Babylon Project was our last, best hope for peace. It failed.”

“There is a hole in your mind”

The first commander of Babylon 5 was Jeffrey Sinclair, a veteran of the Battle of the Line; the last defence of Earth as they tried to stop the Minbari. Tens of thousands of humans took part in the battle and fewer than 200 survived. Sinclair was one of them. He can’t remember much of the battle, and can only recall being rescued from his fighter once the Minbari had surrendered. The mystery of what happened to Sinclair and the Minbari surrender is explored through the early part of the show.

The Story

What blew my mind the first time I watched the show fully from start to finish was how many different plots were being woven together. There was the rise of a fascist government on Earth, the seeds of the telepath war, the Earth civil war, the conflict between the Narn and the Centauri, the Shadows and the Vorlons, and the mystery of the Minbari surrender at the Battle of the Line. To have so many spinning plates, and yet have such a tightly bound narrative is not just impressive, it’s a work of genius.

Long-Form Storytelling Before It Was Cool

One of Babylon 5’s greatest achievements is its structure. Plot threads introduced in early episodes often pay off seasons later. Characters evolve in meaningful ways, shaped by the events they experience. Political alliances shift. Wars begin and end. Consequences linger.

This was unusual at the time. Many networks were wary of serialised storytelling, fearing audiences wouldn’t keep up. Babylon 5 ignored that concern and committed fully to its narrative. In doing so, it helped pave the way for later shows, both within and outside science fiction, that embraced long-form storytelling as the norm.

It’s difficult to overstate Babylon 5’s influence. Long before prestige television became the norm, it demonstrated that audiences were willing to invest in complex, serialised storytelling. It showed that science fiction could handle politics, philosophy, and character development with depth and nuance. While later shows often get the credit, Babylon 5 was one of the first to prove that television didn’t have to reset every week.

Echoes of Middle-earth in Deep Space

One of the more interesting ways to look at Babylon 5 is not just as science fiction, but as a kind of space-borne epic fantasy. Strip away the jump gates and starfuries, and what you’re left with has far more in common with The Lord of the Rings than you might initially expect.

At a structural level, both stories are about the end of an age.

In The Lord of the Rings, the world is moving beyond the time of elves, ancient powers, and myth. Magic is fading, and the future belongs to humanity. In Babylon 5, a similar transition is taking place. The ancient races, the Vorlons and the Shadows, have shaped the galaxy for millennia, manipulating younger civilizations like pieces on a board. But their time is coming to an end.

The younger races are faced with a choice: continue to be guided (or controlled) by these ancient powers, or step out on their own and define their future. That idea, rejecting the influence of older, more powerful forces and choosing your own path, sits at the heart of both stories.

There are also clear thematic parallels in how power is portrayed. In Tolkien’s world, the One Ring represents the corrupting influence of power and the temptation to use it “for good.” In Babylon 5, the influence of the Shadows and Vorlons operates in a similar way. Both offer a form of power or guidance, but at a cost. Aligning with either side means sacrificing autonomy.

Neither side is truly benevolent. Both believe they are right. And both are ultimately shown to be part of a cycle that needs to be broken. Even the character arcs echo this epic, almost mythological structure. Londo Mollari’s tragic descent feels not unlike a Tolkien figure corrupted by ambition and circumstance, while G’Kar’s journey from anger and vengeance to wisdom and reflection carries the weight of a character who has seen the cost of hatred and chosen a different path.

As well as thematic links to Lord of the Rings there are more obvious references. The Shadow homeworld is Z’Ha’Dum, which is a nod to Khazad-dum. Both works feature a group called The Rangers who work to protect those in need. 

Space Battles That Felt Real

Unlike earlier sci-fi, where space battles often resembled naval engagements or aerial dogfights transplanted into space, Babylon 5 made a conscious effort to think about how combat might actually work in a zero-gravity, three-dimensional environment.

Ships don’t just bank and turn like aircraft. They can rotate on their axes, and take full advantage of things like inertia.

It gives battles a sense of weight and realism that many shows lacked at the time.

Capital ships also behave differently. Engagements feel less like choreographed duels and more like chaotic, overlapping exchanges of fire, with multiple ships manoeuvring in a shared battlespace. There’s a sense that positioning matters, that timing matters, and that once a battle begins, it can quickly spiral beyond anyone’s control.

There is a video on YouTube where someone breaks down the Battle of Proxima III and argues it is the best space battle put to screen because of how much thought went into the planning and writing of it. It’s not just a CGI mess of different ships firing different coloured blasters at each other, there are stakes, objectives, and clear tactics on both sides. 

Babylon 5 vs Deep Space Nine

If you talk about Babylon 5 for long enough, you inevitably end up talking about Deep Space Nine. The two shows aired at almost the same time, shared a broadly similar premise; a space station acting as a political and cultural crossroads, and, for years, were compared in ways that bordered on rivalry.

On the surface, the similarities are obvious. Both are set on stationary outposts rather than roaming starships. Both focus on politics, diplomacy, and long-form conflict. Both introduce a nearby gateway to distant space (a wormhole in DS9, jump points and hyperspace routes in Babylon 5). And both gradually evolve from localised tensions into large-scale interstellar wars. Both introduce a new ship for the station’s crew to use, and, there’s not really any other way of saying it, but the commanders of both stations end up as Space Jesus.

All in all, Babylon 5 was not without its faults. It had a lower budget, and some awful acting. On the other hand, no one (with the exception of the writers of The Expanse) has told a more compelling story with such an airtight internal consistency. 

Babylon 5 is primed for a big budget reboot but it would need more than just a few short seasons of six episodes each to tell the full sweeping story. It ran for 110 episodes and still left a lot unsaid. 

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: 

Watching: Beef Season 2 (Netflix)

Reading: Leviathan Wakes (Expanse Book 1) by James S. A. Corey

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £141,911.62.

Fuck It Fund: £19.15.

Pensions: £118,073.10.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £502,366.87.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £174,145.84. 

Total Debts: £174,145.84.

Total Wealth: £328,221.03.

The stock market is bouncing back a little, at least until Trump decides to blow up the internet again. He is so stupid. I don’t think a word has been invented that fully describes just how ignorant this guy really is. Anyway, I need to stop here before I go on a full rant about the orange menace.

I’m still in the process of building my pipeline at work, and I’m not going to see any serious money for a while yet. Once that money starts coming in my priority will be to use up the remaining £12k ISA allowance for this year. After that, I’ll look to build up a balance in my Premium Bonds and FIF with a view to maxing out my ISA allowance next year. 

Whilst smashing my ISA is a major priority I should not forget about my pension. It doesn’t need as much money pumping in as my ISA because it has more time to grow, whereas my ISA will be called upon a full decade earlier than my pension. Even so, it would be foolish to ignore it completely. I’ve been drip feeding £50 per month into my SIPP but once I have a more regular income I’ll increase that significantly. 

That’s all for this week. Thanks for reading and have a great week ahead.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Part 338: Slowing Down

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

So I’ve been struggling a little to find time to write to the quality I would like recently.  Rather than putting out posts I’m not happy with, I’m going to take a step back and slow down a little. I’m thinking that my posts may be every fortnite as opposed to weekly. In fairness, since I started this blog in November 2019 it has, with only a couple of exceptions, seen a minimum of one post per week.

I’ve included my updated weekly finances below and my list of greatest sci-fi shows discussed so far, which I’ll pick back up next week.  

Thanks for reading and supporting Mortgage Advisor on FIRE.

The Greatest Science Fiction Shows 

I’ve noticed a few posts recently listing sci-fi shows and movies with titles like “best ever” and “greatest of all time”.  I thought I’d enter the chat and list my top ten sci-fi shows of all time, starting at number ten and working my way to the best one of all over the next ten weeks.

Note: for a show to qualify, it has to have finished.

So far, I’ve covered:

10 – The Outer Limits

9 – The X-Files

8 – Space: Above and Beyond

7 – Quantum Leap

6 – Battlestar Galactica (2004)

5 – Dark

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: Artifact by Jeremy Robinson

Watching: 

Reading: 

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £140,614.86.

Fuck It Fund: £19.15.

Pensions: £117,756.69.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £500,753.70.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £174,145.84. 

Total Debts: £174,145.84.

Total Wealth: £326,607.86.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.

Part 337: Falling Down

Hello and welcome back to Mortgage Advisor on FIRE. 

Weekly Update

It’s been one of those weeks where work has absolutely dominated everything. The kind of week where your calendar fills itself, you tick all ten things off your to-do list only to find you finish each day with more on it than you started, and before you know it, you’re wondering where the week went. 

That said, I did manage to get out on the bike a few times so I could argue with idiots walking on the cycle lanes again. It really does help clear the mind; the cycling that is, not the arguing with morons.

There’s something about being on the bike that forces you to be present. No emails, no notifications, just me, the road, and whatever questionable life choices led me to cycling uphill for fun.

Unfortunately, one of those rides didn’t quite go to plan.

At some point as we were almost home, my rear wheel clipped the corner of something.

What followed was that bizarre, almost cinematic, effect where time just slowed down. You know exactly what’s happening, you know how it’s going to end, but you’re completely powerless to stop it. It felt like it took about three to five business days to actually hit the ground. Plenty of time to reflect on life, question my coordination, accept my fate, and wonder if I’m going to show up on a reel of people crashing into things.

Inevitably, gravity did its thing. So, a week of hard graft, a few decent rides, and a slightly humbling encounter with the ground. All in all, fairly on brand.

Advertisements

Project Hail Mary

On Monday I went to see Project Hail Mary with Oana and my Dad. We all loved the book but we all agreed the movie was underwhelming. Visually it was fantastic, but I felt the whole thing was very rushed. I don’t want to say too much and spoil it for my readers if they’ve not seen it yet. I would say that if the film’s premise has grabbed you, definitely read the book or listen to the audiobook. It’s brilliant.

We went on a mass cycle ride on Saturday morning with dozens of other people. It was a great crowd and lots of fun. Following that, Oana and I stopped at home for lunch before heading back out again for another ride. We were cycling down the side of the river when we saw a heron on the wall next to us. We see herons all the time in, and around, Kelham Island, but we’ve never gotten so close to one as we did this day. It was happily munching away on some food people had left for it. 

The Greatest Science Fiction Shows 

I’ve noticed a few posts recently listing sci-fi shows and movies with titles like “best ever” and “greatest of all time”.  I thought I’d enter the chat and list my top ten sci-fi shows of all time, starting at number ten and working my way to the best one of all over the next ten weeks.

Note: for a show to qualify, it has to have finished.

So far, I’ve covered:

10 – The Outer Limits

9 – The X-Files

8 – Space: Above and Beyond

7 – Quantum Leap

6 – Battlestar Galactica (2004)

And so we arrive at number five on the list…

5 – Dark (2017–2020)

Dark is one of the most intricate and intellectually demanding science-fiction series ever made. Created in Germany by Baran bo Odar and Jantje Friese, the show takes a familiar concept, time travel, and turns it into something far more complex, unsettling, and philosophical.

Set in the small town of Winden, the story begins with the disappearance of a child. At first, it feels like a mystery grounded in the present. But it quickly becomes clear that this is something much larger. As more children vanish and strange events unfold, connections begin to emerge between different families, different time periods, and different versions of the same people.

What starts as a missing persons case evolves into a sprawling narrative spanning multiple generations and multiple timelines.

At the heart of Dark is an idea: time is not a straight line, and more importantly, it may not be something that can be changed.

Another defining feature of Dark is its focus on family. The show revolves around four interconnected families, and over time it becomes clear that their relationships are far more complicated than they initially appear. Characters are linked across generations in ways that are often shocking, with identities looping back on themselves in ways that challenge any straightforward understanding of lineage.

Advertisements

The famous “family tree” in Dark is less a tree and more a tangled web, or a knot that tightens as the series progresses.

This has profound implications for identity. Characters encounter younger and older versions of themselves, confront the consequences of their own actions across time, and are forced to question whether they are truly individuals or simply parts of a larger pattern.

Free Will vs Determinism

Dark explores whether anything can truly be changed. Characters repeatedly attempt to alter events, driven by love, guilt, or desperation. But again and again, their actions seem to reinforce the very outcomes they are trying to avoid. The past, present, and future are locked together in a cycle that feels impossible to break. This creates a philosophical tension that runs through the entire series. Are the characters making choices, or are they simply following a script that has already been written? The show doesn’t offer easy answers. Instead, it leans into the discomfort of that uncertainty.

In the genre of science fiction and time travel, many shows focus on accessibility and broad appeal, Dark does the opposite. It demands attention, patience, and a willingness to engage with complex ideas. It doesn’t explain everything. It doesn’t simplify its concepts. And it certainly doesn’t hold the viewer’s hand. But for those willing to invest the time, it offers something rare: a science-fiction story that treats its audience as capable of grappling with genuinely challenging ideas.

One of those ideas takes the form of a type of temporal paradox I love; The Bootstrap Paradox.

There’s something deeply unsettling about the idea that not everything has a beginning. We’re wired to believe in cause and effect, in origins, in neat little chains where one thing leads to another. The Bootstrap Paradox quietly dismantles that comfort. It suggests that sometimes, the chain doesn’t have a first link at all. It just loops back on itself, endlessly.

In simple terms, it’s a paradox where an object, a piece of information, or even an idea exists without ever being created. It is passed back through time and becomes its own origin. No author. No inventor. No moment of creation. Just a closed loop, humming away, self-sustaining and impossible to untangle. Ask where it started, and you’ll find yourself going in circles.

Let’s look at an example involving a watch, and don’t worry this isn’t a Pulp Fiction story. You have a watch that has been around the block a few times. Your father gave you this watch which he received as a gift from a stranger years ago. Sometime later you go back in time and meet your father as a young man. You give him the watch. He lives his life and then gifts the watch to his son; you. 

In this example, the watch has no beginning or end, hence the paradox. You’re possibly wondering why it’s called The Bootstrap Paradox, but the etymology of that could be a whole post on its own. Let’s just say that the phrase “pulling yourself up from your bootstraps” was the origin of the phrase to “boot up” your computer, and all the associated phrases that comes with that, like reboot and so on.

Anyway, this is where Dark stops being a time travel show and starts becoming something far more claustrophobic. Because it doesn’t just flirt with the Bootstrap Paradox, it embraces it fully.

The first two seasons of Dark are some of the best television you will ever see. The third, and final season, was not, and this is the only reason it is not higher on this list. 

#AD – Do you want to help me earn a little cash for free? Of course you do!

Now that I’m self-employed I’ve signed up with a few businesses that offer services that assist with getting a mortgage.  One such service comes from Check My File which brings together your credit report from multiple sources into a detailed breakdown of your credit history.

Normally there is a £14.99 monthly charge but with my link you can get a FREE 7-day trial.  My affiliate link allows you to create an account, get your report, and if you want to cancel within the 7 day trial period you will not be charged.  If you want to keep the service beyond the trial period, the £14.99 monthly charge applies.  

By signing up to the trial period, you’ll help me out with a small commission even if you cancel inside that trial period. 

Important points:

1. This code is for a free 7-day trial for those who have not had an account with Check My File before.

2. You can cancel anytime with no penalty.

3. If you do not cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will be charged £14.99 until you cancel.

4. It will ask for payment details, but if you cancel within the 7-day trial period, you will not be charged (assuming you have not had an account with them before).

5. I will earn a small commission from Check My File for each person who signs up for the free trial, whether they continue to a paid membership or not. 

6. I do not get to see your credit report.  It is private to you, unless you choose to share it. 

7. To make sure the code tracks, please complete your sign-up in one sitting i.e. don’t close the tab and start again later.

8. Make sure you download your report before cancelling.

9. Yes, this is a shameless plug, but my last wage was paid in October.

https://www.checkmyfile.partners/GZMJPSJ/2CTPL

What I’m Doing

Listening: Artifact by Jeremy Robinson

Watching: Project Hail Mary

Reading: nothing

Financial Update

Assets

Premium Bonds: £250.00.

Stocks and Shares ISA: £138,151.51.

Fuck It Fund: £19.15.

Pensions: £115,950.68.

Residential Property Value: £242,113.00. 

Total Assets: £496,484.34.

Debts

Residential Mortgage: £174,145.84. 

Total Debts: £174,145.84.

Total Wealth: £322,338.50.

I dropped £8k into my ISA by drawing funds from my FIF and my Premium Bonds. The market has also recovered a little, meaning my ISA is now at the highest it’s ever been. It’s entirely possible that my ISA balance will be higher than my mortgage balance by the end of the year. 

We are locked in to our mortgage deal until January 2031, but when that time comes around we will have an important decision in front of us. Being mortgage free is a huge boost to any FI journey, but my ISA is also my bridge to accessing my pension. 

Another thing to consider is my new self-employed venture. If I can build a steady pipeline of business, I should be in a position to hammer both my ISA and the mortgage. 

Anyway, this is all I’ve got time for this week as it’s currently almost midnight on Saturday as I’m finishing this up. Thanks for reading and have a great week ahead.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions in this blog are my own, and do not represent the views or opinions of my former, current, or future employers, nor should they be considered advice.

If you want personalised financial advice, seek an appropriate professional.  If you are in financial difficulty, seek advice via the resources below:

StepChange

MoneyHelper

Biolink 

You can now find all my social media pages by checking out my Biolink:

bio.link/davidscothern.